PE Explorer Activation key

PE Explorer Activation key

Serial Key, PE Explorer. Heaventools PE Explorer 1.99 R6 With Patch b8414 Free Download Crack Patch Serial Key Keygen Full Version Andre Lancia; No videos. Navicat Premium Serial Key Connect to local and remote servers, collaborate, PE Explorer 2.0 Crack with Activation Key Latest Version. Latest Features Of Pe Explorer 2019 Serial Key. Advanced visual resource viewer and editor; Analyze, diagnose issues, repair and restore.

Thematic video

NoMalware Full Version PE Explorer Trick

PE Explorer Activation key -

Transcriptional changes and the role of ONECUT1 in hPSC pancreatic differentiation


Cell type specification during pancreatic development is tightly controlled by a transcriptional and epigenetic network. The precise role of most transcription factors, however, has been only described in mice. To convey such concepts to human pancreatic development, alternative model systems such as pancreatic in vitro differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells can be employed. Here, we analyzed stage-specific RNA-, ChIP-, and ATAC-sequencing data to dissect transcriptional and regulatory mechanisms during pancreatic development. Transcriptome and open chromatin maps of pancreatic differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells provide a stage-specific pattern of known pancreatic transcription factors and indicate ONECUT1 as a crucial fate regulator in pancreas progenitors. Moreover, our data suggest that ONECUT1 is also involved in preparing pancreatic progenitors for later endocrine specification. The dissection of the transcriptional and regulatory circuitry revealed an important role for ONECUT1 within such network and will serve as resource to study human development and disease.


Damage to the endocrine pancreas can cause several forms of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes, as one of the major diseases in industrial countries, affects over 350 million people worldwide. Type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are the most common forms and have a multifactorial etiology, but the current classification does not cover the large clinical and biological variability of the disease1,2. While T1D is a chronic autoimmune disease affecting insulin-producing β-cells, T2D is a metabolic disease. In T2D, insulin deficiency is caused by insulin resistance in target organs and pancreatic β-cell failure. The onset and pathophysiology of diabetes is influenced by a complex interplay of several factors such as environment, genetic predisposition, and immune system. Additionally, a small subset of diabetes patients, generally estimated to account for approximately 1–5% of cases, is caused by monogenic mutations3,4 altering the development, function or survival of β-cells through a variety of mechanisms. Interestingly, frequent variants of several genes, whose mutations cause monogenic diabetes, are also associated with an increased risk of multifactorial diabetes. Therefore, the characterization of pancreatic differentiation and the study of genes and regulatory pathways involved in pancreatic endocrine development and function are extremely valuable to discover potential candidates contributing to the development of different forms of diabetes.

Binding of transcription factors (TFs) at specific promoters, enhancers, and repressors controls gene expression and thus, drives cellular differentiation. Understanding the transcriptional regulations that underlie cell fate decisions requires the characterization of TF binding sites across multiple differentiation stages. Pancreatic in vitro differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells (PSC) constitutes a suitable human model system with access to distinct developmental stages5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12. In turn, different forms of diabetes have been appropriately modeled by PSC differentiations13. Sequencing techniques such as RNA and Assay for Transposase Accessible Chromatin sequencing (RNA-seq and ATAC-seq) can be applied at distinct differentiation stages to allow the global characterization of transcriptional and regulatory changes during pancreatic differentiation. Moreover, computational analysis of ATAC-seq data such as digital footprinting14,15 can be applied to systematically identify cis-regulatory regions and putative TF binding sites controlling stage-specific regulation. With chromatin immunoprecipitation DNA sequencing (ChIP-seq) the actual binding of specific TFs to such regulatory gene clusters can be determined.

Here, we applied stage-specific RNA-, ChIP-seq, and ATAC-seq experiments during PSC-based differentiations to dissect transcriptional and regulatory mechanisms during pancreatic development. We specifically focused on the functional role of the TF ONECUT1 and found an important role as regulator of pancreas progenitor differentiation in our analysis. In our accompanying study, we could additionally demonstrate that mutations in ONECUT1 contribute to a broad spectrum of diabetes16.


Transcriptome maps of pancreas differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells

Notably, human pancreatic development is faithfully recapitulated by differentiation of PSCs into the pancreatic lineage5,6,7,11,17. We acquired stage-specific RNA-seq, ATAC-seq, and ChIP-seq data in such a human stem cell-based differentiation approach to characterize pancreatic development (Fig. 1a). Stage-specific modulation of signaling pathways such as Wnt and Hedgehog differentiates PSCs from embryonic stem cell stage (ESC) towards definitive endoderm (DE), followed by gut tube endoderm (GT), pancreatic endoderm (PE), and pancreatic progenitors (PP). Key TFs and cellular markers were indeed stage-specifically expressed (Fig. 1b, c and Supplementary Fig. 1a, b). SOX2 (cluster I), an essential factor for pluripotency and self-renewal18 was expressed in pluripotent stem cells and became downregulated during DE differentiation, while in exchange markers of DE stage such as GATA6, CXCR4, and SOX1719,20,21 became upregulated (cluster II). Expression of FOXA1/2, important for pancreatic specification by regulating PDX1 expression22,23, was induced during DE stage (cluster III) and its expression was sustained in PE stage. In turn, PDX1 was upregulated at PE stage (cluster IV). Similarly, GATA4 was expressed at PE stage and NKX6.1, GP2, PROX1, PTF1A, and SOX9 at PP stage (cluster III, IV)24,25,26. Moreover, TFs important for later stages of endocrine development such as GLIS3, NEUROD1 and ISL1 (cluster IV, VII) started to be expressed at PE and PP stage27,28. To support these gene expression dynamics during pancreatic differentiation, we employed two additional human embryonic stem cell lines (Fig. 1d–f and Supplementary Fig. 1c, d). We observed a similar expression pattern of stage-specific TFs in two further data sets employing distinct cell lines5,17,29,30, where key markers for PSC (SOX2), DE (SOX17, CXCR4), PE (PDX1), and PP stage (NKX6.1) as well as other TFs such as FOXA2, SOX9, and PROX1 were expressed at the respective stages. To evaluate the capacity of the protocols and to quantify stages closer to pancreatic endocrine cells, we performed a gene set-based analysis with developmental genes of the endocrine pancreas. The expression of endocrine genes was enriched in PE and PP stage for HUES89,11,12 and MEL1 protocols17 and for PP and endocrine progenitor (EP) stage in the CyT49 protocol29 (Fig. 1g). Expression of endocrine genes was again decreased in CyT49 differentiation stages resembling fetal β-cells (FE stage). Moreover, the HUES8 protocol explored herein had the highest increase of pancreatic endocrine gene expression among all three protocols.

a Schematic outline of applied pancreatic differentiation strategy of human pluripotent stem cells and subsequent stage-specific large-scale sequencing analysis. RNA-seq data (own and E-MTAB-1086), ATAC-seq data (own), ChIP-seq data of ONECUT1 (own), FOXA1, FOXA2, PDX1 (GSE54471, GSE149148) and NKX6.1 (own), and histone data (H3K4me1, H3K27ac, GSE54471; H3K4me3, ArrayExpress E-MTAB-1086) were used for analysis. b Stage-specific expression analysis of depicted genes during pancreas differentiation of HUES8 cells (RNA-seq, n = 6 biologically independent samples). c Fuzzy c-means (FCM) clustering of the differentially expressed genes (RNA-seq) at the varying differentiation stages of hESCs (HUES8) displaying selected genes at respective clusters. d Stage-specific expression analysis of depicted genes during pancreas differentiation of CyT49 cells30 (RNA-seq, n = 2 biologically independent samples). e Heatmap of fuzzy c-means clustering of differentially expressed genes (RNA-seq) at distinct pancreatic differentiation stages of CyT49 cells30. Selected genes of particular clusters are highlighted. f Heatmap of fuzzy c-means clustering of differentially expressed genes (RNA-seq, n = 4) at the distinct pancreas differentiation stages of MEL1. Selected genes of particular clusters are displayed. Of note, cells at PP stage were purified for PDX1 and NKX6.1. g Expression of genes associated with endocrine pancreas differentiation obtained from Gene Ontology (ID GO:0031018) for all protocols. Boxplots depict median (center), interquartile range (box) and extreme values (whiskers). A statistical test (Wilcoxon Rank Sum test; one sided) was used to compare the expression of endocrine genes vs. all other genes.

Full size image

Open chromatin maps of pancreas differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells

To spatiotemporally map genome-wide chromatin accessibility during pancreatic differentiation, we performed the ATAC with massively parallel sequencing at different stages of pancreatic differentiation (Fig. 2a). First, clustering of the developmentally regulated open chromatin (OC) regions revealed stage-specific OC clusters like clusters obtained via RNA-seq (Figs. 1c and 2a). The SOX2 locus (cluster I) was accessible only in ESC stage, whereas the loci for CXCR4 and SOX17 (cluster IX) became accessible during differentiation to DE stage. The FOXA1/2 locus had limited accessibility at DE stage but opened during further development (cluster VI, VIII) like RNA expression patterns. The NKX6.1 locus was allocated to a cluster peaking at the PP stage (Cluster V; Fig. 2a). Similarly, chromatin accessibility for other core endocrine gene loci such as GLIS3 or MAFB was initiated from PE to PP stage (Cluster VIII; Fig. 2a).

a Fuzzy c-means clustering of the differential open chromatin peaks (ATAC-seq) during pancreatic differentiation of HUES8 cells. b TF binding motif enrichment at distinct open chromatin clusters of ATAC-seq. c Average chromatin accessibility profiles around footprint-supported bindings sites of selected TFs. d Heatmap ChIP-seq signals (+/− 5 kb of peak center) of H3K4me1, H3K4me3, and H3K27ac at ATAC-seq peaks from cluster PE-PP (VIII; clustering is shown in Fig. 2a). Peaks are ordered by the decrease in the H3K4me1 mark at PE stage. We also depict ONECUT1 ChIP-seq signals (PP stage) in the vicinity of the peak (+/− 5 kb).

Full size image

Next, we investigated if TF binding motifs were stage-specifically enriched in OC loci to dissect regulatory changes between distinct TFs (Fig. 2b). This unbiased footprinting analysis indicated the activity of well-known TFs to control pancreas expression programs: GATA6 and SOX9 in early stages and NKX6.1, NKX6.2, FOXA1, FOXA2, MAF, PDX1, and ONECUT1 in later stages. This cell-specific enrichment, i.e., importance of GATA6 in early DE stage, FOXA2 in PE stage and ONECUT1 in both PE and PP stages, was illustrated by the accessibility profiles around footprinting-supported motifs (Fig. 2c). This showed an increasing activity of ONECUT1 motif with a peak on both PE and PP stages, while FOXA2 had a peak activity in PE stage only.

ONECUT1 during human pancreas development

Following our genetic study identifying ONECUT1 as diabetes gene involved in a broad spectrum of diabetes in human (accompanying article)16, we focused our further analysis on ONECUT1. This TF has so far been mainly characterized in mouse models31,32,33,34 and little is known about its role during human pancreatic differentiation35. ONECUT1 expression increased from the DE stage to the PE stage with sustained expression at the PP stage (Fig. 1b, f). ONECUT1 was assigned alongside key TFs necessary for PE development including FOXA1/2, GATA4, as well as NGN3 and MNX1 known to be important for the initiation of the β-cell program (Cluster III; Fig. 1c). Robust expression from the PE to the PP stage was reproduced on published data sets in several genetic backgrounds (MEL15,17 and CyT4929,30 hESCs) (Fig. 1g–j). Notably, ONECUT1 was only marginally expressed at the gut tube stage (Fig. 1f). Moreover, the ONECUT1 locus opened around the GT and peaked at the PE stage (Fig. 2a), closely correlating with gene transcription levels (Figs. 1b, c). Additionally, motif enrichment and footprint analysis15 confirmed the dynamic and increasing activity of ONECUT1 from the PE to the PP stage (Fig. 2b, c). While ONECUT1-bound elements within the PE/PP cluster had high levels of active enhancer marks (both H3K4me1 and H3K27ac) beginning at the PE stage, they displayed very low levels of the promoter mark H3K4me3 at all stages (Fig. 2d). Taken together, these data suggest that accessible chromatin dynamics during pancreatic cell fate acquisition follow precise stage-specific patterns.

ONECUT1 is a crucial regulator of pancreas progenitors

We have recently investigated the occupancy of ONECUT1 binding at the GT and PP stages by performing ChIP-seq experiments35. In line with the ONECUT1 expression profile, we observed only a few hundred ONECUT1 ChIP-seq peaks at the GT stage, predominantly at promoter sites. In contrast, at the PP stage tens of thousands of ONECUT1 ChIP-seq peaks were found, predominantly located in distal gene regions (Fig. 3a). ONECUT1-bound genes were enriched within the PE, PE-PP transition, and most abundantly in the PP gene cluster, indicating an increasingly important role of ONECUT1 during PP differentiation (Fig. 3b, c). Similar enrichment of ONECUT1 in PE and PP clusters was also observed in cells from other genetic backgrounds (Fig. 3f, g). GREAT analysis (Genomic Regions Enrichment of Annotations Tool36) of ONECUT1-bound genes was associated with processes such as (endocrine) pancreas and endocrine system development, decreased insulin secretion, and pancreatic hypoplasia (Fig. 3d, e).

a Distribution of ONECUT1 ChIP-seq peaks at GT and PP stages relative to genomic regions. b Schematic of the binding enrichment analysis evaluating whether ONECUT1-bound genes (binding observed 20 kb upstream or downstream of the respective promoter regions) are enriched in particular RNA-seq clusters. c Binding enrichment (z-score) test of ONECUT1 (ChIP-seq, PP stage) in genes of the RNA-seq clusters of HUES8 cells (z-test; one-sided). d, e Enrichment analysis (GREAT36) of ONECUT1-bound genes (ChIP-seq, PP stage) (Fischer Exact test; one-sided). f Binding enrichment (z-score) test of ONECUT1 (ChIP-seq, PP stage) in genes of the RNA-seq clusters of CyT49 cells (z-test; one-sided). Significance is indicated above bars (Fischer Exact test; one-sided). g Binding enrichment test of ONECUT1 (ChIP-seq, PP) for MEL1 RNA-seq specific gene clusters. Data show binding score (z-score) with p-value (z-test; one-sided). h Overlap of ONECUT1 ChIP-seq peaks (PP stage, own data set) with peaks from other TFs (previously published at GSE54471, GSE149148, or NKX6.1; own data set). For the other TFs, only the number of binding peaks overlapping with ONECUT1 is shown.

Full size image

During pancreatic cell differentiation, the state of enhancers is accompanied by a defined sequence of chromatin changes: chromatin decompaction via pioneer factors or cooperative TF binding, poising/priming via accumulation of H3K4me1 marks, and activation by deposition of H3K27ac marks. This leads to the acquisition of a cell fate-specific gene expression program29,37,38,39,40,41,42. To further characterize the nature of distal ONECUT1 binding sites at the PP stage (Fig. 3a), we cross-referenced our data with public and own ChIP-seq data for enhancer histone marks (active: H3K4me1/H3K27ac; poised: H3K4me1) and TFs (NKX6.1, FOXA2, GATA6 and PDX1) at the PP stage29,30. To characterize chromatin states associated with ONECUT1 and these TFs, we made use of a chromHMM annotation data set43 employing the same pancreas differentiation stages35. This annotation allowed us to gather additional information of active and inactive enhancers, active promoters and repressive regions among others.

First, we observed an overlap of ONECUT1 peaks with PDX1, GATA6, FOXA2, and NKX6.1 in 21, 10, 6, and 4% of peaks (Fig. 3h). The evaluation of chromatin states indicated that ONECUT1 primarily bound to enhancers (strong or weak) and the number of enhancers particularly increased after the GT stage. ONECUT1 was bound to 3.6% of active enhancers existing in GT stage, 9.7% of active enhancers in PE stage and 14% of active enhancers in PP stage (Fig. 4a). Among TFs analyzed here, only PDX1 was bound to a larger number of active enhancers, e.g., 9%, 21%, and 31% for GT, PE, and PP stages, respectively (Fig. 4a). Next, we asked if co-binding of GATA6, PDX1, NKX6.1, and FOXA2 with ONECUT1 is enriched for particular chromatin states. Interestingly, we observed that co-binding events of ONECUT1 with these TFs were particularly enriched in active enhancers (Fig. 4b). Highest increase (log2 fold change >2) was detected in PE and PP stages for FOXA2, PDX1 and GATA6. To check if these co-binding events were reflected in motif positioning, we performed a MEME-ChIP analysis. This analysis detected a de novo ONECUT1 motif (89% of peaks) central to peaks and a FOXA2 motif (24% of peaks), which preferentially binds 9–10 bps from the peak center (Fig. 4c). This also supports a physical proximity and possible interaction of ONECUT1 and FOXA2. These results support altogether that ONECUT1 is associated to activation of PE and PP specific enhancers by presumably  co-binding PDX1, GATA6 and FOXA2.

a Overlap of peaks of distinct TFs on chromatin states as delineated by chromHMM. These states include active enhancers (EnhA), weak/poised enhancers (EnhWk.), repressed regions (Repr.), active promoters (TssA), poised promoters (TssBiv) and regions flanking active promoters (TssFlnk1-2). b Log2 fold change (FC) of the frequency of ONECUT1 co-binding events (ONECUT1 with either GATA6, PDX1, NKX6.1, and FOXA2) vs. ONECUT1 exclusive binding sites for distinct chromatin states and differentiation stages. Red values indicate chromatin stages over-represented in co-binding events. We highlight values with abs(log2(FC)) > 2. c We show MEME de novo motifs around ONECUT1 ChIP-seq peaks, which are found in 89% of peaks, and FOXA2 motif, which is found in 24% of peaks. Both motifs have a preference relative to the peak center, i.e., ONECUT1 is mostly localized in the peak middle, while FOXA2 is located 9–10 bps downstream of peak center. d IGV Genome browser view of ONECUT1 and PE/PP expressed genes with ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq profiles from GT, PE, and PP stages. We highlight ONECUT1 peaks overlapping with active enhancers (blue tracks below H3K27ac tracks) gained at PE or PP stage, as well as co-binding partners.

Full size image

The previous analysis indicated that ONECUT1 is associated with novel active enhancers in PE and PP stages. We therefore investigated genomic loci of genes with PE and PP specific expression (Fig. 1c, e), which gained an active enhancer from GT to PE or PE to PP stages. The ONECUT1 gene has a large PP specific de novo active enhancer up-stream of its promoter, which was co-bound by ONECUT1, FOXA2, GATA6, and PDX1 (Fig. 4d). FOXA2 and NGN3 (NEUROG3) were two genes with high expression in PE/PP stages (Fig. 1c). Both had ONECUT1 binding sites associated with novel acquisition of an active enhancer at the PE stage by either co-binding with GATA6 or PDX1 (Fig. 4d). PROX1, GP2, and SOX9 were genes with high expression in PP stage (Fig. 1c, e). These genes had several de novo active enhancers mostly gained at PP stage (Fig. 4d). Notably, ONECUT1 co-binds with GATA6 and FOXA2 in most of these enhancers. In all enhancers, we observed the deposition of H3K4me1 marks and ATAC-seq starting from GT stages and preceding the activating marks H3K27ac. This supports the priming mechanism of ONECUT1 observed in Fig. 2d and provides examples of important pancreas genes being regulated by ONECUT1.

ONECUT1 regulates islet cell genes

Subsequent GREAT analysis highlighted the role of ONECUT1 in specification toward a β-cell-specific program with top-ranked terms like “MODY” or “regulation of β-cell development” (Fig. 5a, b). ONECUT1-bound pancreatic enhancers accumulated H3K4me1 around the GT stage, while H3K27ac accumulated only from GT stage on, surpassing H3K4me1 levels at the PP stage (Fig. 5c). This is in line with the observation that pancreatic enhancers acquired a poised state around the GT stage prior to activation29 and indicates that ONECUT1 might be crucial for priming and activating enhancers formed at the PE stage.

a, b Enrichment analysis (GREAT36) of ONECUT1-bound pancreatic enhancers (FG/PE and PE clusters from ref. 29) for “pathway terms” (a) from the MSigDB pathway genes subset CP and for “GO Biological Process” (b) from the Gene Ontology Consortium (Binomial test; one side). c Distribution of stage-specific H3K4me1 and H3K27ac ChIP-seq signal at ONECUT1-bound pancreatic enhancers (FG/PE and PE clusters from ref. 29). Boxplots depict median (center), interquartile range (box) and extreme values (whiskers), point and connecting line mean value. d Binding enrichment (z-score) test of ONECUT1 (ChIP-seq, PP stage) in distinct OC clusters of HUES8 ATAC-seq (z-test; one side). e Enrichment analysis (GREAT36) of ONECUT1-bound genes overlapping with PE/PP ATAC-seq (cluster VIII) for “pathway terms” (Binomial test; one side). f, g Overlap between ChIP-seq peaks of ONECUT1 (PP stage) and depicted TFs with islet enhancers (f) and islet promoters (g) together with distinct histone modification as defined by ref. 45. h Overlap between ONECUT1 ChIP-seq peaks (PP stage) with islet TF peaks (NKX6.1 and NKX2.2 ChIP-seq from human islets45; intersection test, one side84). i Interactive Genome Viewer (IGV) plots illustrates ONECUT1 binding peaks and histone marks in promoter regions for selected endocrine genes. Genomic locations refer to human genome assembly GRCh37 (Hg19).

Full size image

To correlate ONECUT1 binding with accessible chromatin, we mapped ONECUT1 ChIP-seq binding peaks from the PP stage to OC clusters from ATAC-seq experiments. ONECUT1 binding was most evident in the transition cluster VIII (PE-PP), followed by cluster V (PP), which indicates that ONECUT1 binding might start at the PE stage to promote a PP program (Fig. 5d). GREAT analysis of the PE-PP cluster identified “MODY” and “regulation of β-cell development” top-ranked together with “FOXA transcription” and “RXR/RAR heterodimerization” (Fig. 5e). Of note, it has been reported that retinoic acid signaling is crucial for establishing the PP stage44. These results indicate that ONECUT1 is bound to active enhancers starting to be accessible at the PE and/or PP stages, supporting its central regulatory function within the pancreatic transcriptional network.

Moreover, ONECUT1 bound to active enhancers (7%) and promoters (18%) (Fig. 5f, g) and to regions bound by NKX6.1 (13%) and NKX2.2 (9%) in human islets45 (Fig. 5h). Interestingly, a large proportion of the few PP ONECUT1 promoter-bound sites were proximal to genes expressed in islets (Fig. 5g), which included promoters of key genes such as RFX3, RFX6, KCNK3, and MAFB active in β-cells (Fig. 5i). In summary, ONECUT1 expression is sustained from the PE to the PP stage and the protein binds to active pancreas-specific enhancers as well as active regulatory regions of islet cells.


Here, we comprehensively characterized transcriptional and chromatin changes in pancreatic in vitro differentiation. Our global resource consists of transcriptional (RNA-seq), chromatin (ATAC-seq) and regulatory (ONECUT1 ChIP-seq) analyses at distinct pancreas differentiation stages. These experiments were complemented with our own and publicly available ChIP-seq data measuring histone marks (H3K4me3, H3K4me1, H3K27ac) and TF (FOXA2, GATA6, NKX6.1, and PDX1) binding at the PP stage. Computational analysis of transcriptional and OC data in our human stem cell differentiation approach revealed expression of ONECUT1 during early pancreatic development at PE and PP stage together with key pancreatic TFs consistent with data from mouse studies32,33,46. Our protocol for differentiating HUES8 cells towards the pancreatic lineage indicated robust induction of the endocrine gene expression program at PE and PP stage. This suggests that our protocol is suitable to explore early transcriptional regulators as well as the impact of so far unknown gene variants impairing endocrine development in diseases such as diabetes. Other cell lines revealed similar but slightly different patterns. Depending on genes to be explored and e.g., the availability of certain reporter cell lines, it might be beneficial to follow gene expression in different protocols and cell lines.

Moreover, ONECUT1-bound genes were enriched for pancreatic and endocrine development. This is in line with Onecut1 knock-out mouse data, demonstrating that Onecut1 regulates Pdx-1 and Ngn3, which are important for pancreatic endocrine specification32,33,46. Onecut1 and Pdx1 interact during murine endocrine development and the combined function of both transcription factors is necessary for β-cell maturation and adaptation46,47,48. This correlates with observed protein interaction16 as well as our motif analysis revealing co-binding to active enhancers during human pancreas differentiation. Our chromatin-regulatory and cis-regulatory binding maps provide evidence that gene transcription regulated by ONECUT1 is located in clusters of OC, which are co-bound within enhancer regions by a complete suite of physically interacting TFs normally enriched in islets45,49,50. Our analysis further suggests combined priming activity of ONECUT1 with TFs FOXA2, GATA6, PDX1, and NKX6.1 by preparing and activating enhancers of important pancreatic regulators for expression. Previously, the major pancreas TF PDX1 was found to regulate β-cell development by binding mainly intron and intergenic but also promoter regions of pancreatic genes such as RFX6, HNF1B, and MEIS151. Our analysis further suggests a role of ONECUT1 priming activity for preparing loci of important pancreatic regulators for expression, e.g., NGN3 (NEUROG3) important for generation of functional β-cells52. Similarly, SOX9, important for regulating NGN3 as well as other TFs during endocrine development53, and PROX1, playing a role in pancreatic progenitor specification and proliferation as well as insulin secretion26,54, are regulated by this TF network and therefore contribute to timed development. This is in line with data gathered in our recent study indicating that binding of ONECUT1 at enhancers triggers an active state in PPs to allow expression of islet-specific TFs NKX6.1, NKX6.2, and NKX2.216. Similar binding to regulatory regions of genes important for endocrine cell development was observed for Nkx6.1 in mice55,56. This may suggest that ONECUT1 plays a similar role inducing the pancreatic transcriptional program and priming cells for further endocrine differentiation.

Binding of ONECUT1 to islet enhancers included regions of genes encoding proteins such as INSM1, important for maturation of endocrine precursor cells and maintenance of adult pancreatic β‐cells57,58 and FOXA2, a regulator for pancreas development and adult pancreatic β‐cell function59,60. In addition, we also observed ONECUT1 binding to active promoters of genes important for β-cell development and function. RFX6 coordinates islet development and β-cell identity in human and mouse but also controls the number of PPs52,61,62. Similarly, we found promoter binding to RFX3, important for differentiation and function of β-cells in mice63. We also found ONECUT1 binding to the promoter of the highly expressed potassium channel KCNK3 (also known as TASK-1) involved in modulating insulin secretion and glucose homeostasis64, as well as in the promoter of MAFB, which is required for regulating development of α- and β-cells in human and in mice65,66. Altogether, our global analyses establish ONECUT1 within the interconnected and tightly controlled regulatory network of pancreatic TFs during pancreatic and endocrine development. Although our data suggest a role for ONECUT1 in pancreatic and endocrine development, limitations apply to bulk cell analysis of differentiation stages due to the complex heterogeneity and interconnectedness of cell populations. Bulk sequencing data illustrate an average characteristic of cell populations and are not able to resolve the complex composition and multiple pathways at a specific differentiation stage. In order to address a possible bias, further in-depth analysis of single-cell data will be needed.

We recently reported ONECUT1 as a gene involved in various forms of human diabetes, ranging from severe neonatal syndromic diabetes (biallelic mutations) and young-onset non-autoimmune diabetes with incomplete penetrance (monoallelic mutations) to common T2D (regulatory variants)16. Further analysis in our human stem cell differentiation model provides evidence that pathogenic ONECUT1 variants disturb the development of pancreatic progenitors and β-like cells due to their diminished capability to activate factors such as NKX6.1, NKX6.2, and NKX2.2 important for β-cell formation.

The present study provides further understanding on the role of ONECUT1 within a tightly controlled network of genes involved in pancreatic and endocrine development. Remarkably, several of the genes belonging to this network are also involved in monogenic and in multifactorial diabetes67,68 further supporting the relevance of our human stem cell differentiation model to help identify and study genes and variants involved in diabetes.


Stem cell culture

Permission for culture and pancreatic differentiation of human embryonic stem cell (hESC) lines was obtained from the Robert Koch Institute within the “79. Genehmigung nach dem Stammzellgesetz, AZ 3.04.02/0084”. HUES8 cell line was received from Harvard University and MEL1 from Stem Cells Ltd. Cells were cultured on plates coated with hESC Matrigel in mTESR1 (STEMCELL Technologies) medium at 5% CO2, 5% O2, and 37 °C and change of medium was performed daily. For splitting our feeder-free single cell cultures twice a week, cells washed with PBS were dissociated for 3–5 min at 37 °C with TrypLE Express (Invitrogen) followed by diluting with blank medium to stop enzyme reaction. Cell suspension was centrifuged at 800 rpm for 5 min and cell pellet was resuspended in mTESR1 medium supplemented with 10 µM ROCK inhibitor (Abcam). Mel1 INSGFP/W cells were cultured according to Nair et al.17.

Differentiation of PSCs into pancreatic progenitor cells

Pancreatic differentiation is based on published protocols69,70. Basal media BE1: MCDB131 (Invitrogen) with 0.8 g/l glucose (Sigma), 1.174 g/l sodium bicarbonate (Sigma), 0.5% fatty acid free BSA (Proliant), 2 mM l-Glutamine; BE3: MCDB131 with 3.32 g/l glucose, 1.754 g/l sodium bicarbonate, 2% FAF-BSA, 2 mM l-Glutamine, 44 mg/l l-Ascorbic acid, 0.5% ITS-X.

For differentiation, culture plates were coated with growth factor reduced Matrigel (BD, 354230) and 300,000 hESCs per 24-well were seeded in mTESR1 containing 10 µM ROCK inhibitor. The following day, differentiation was initiated when cells reached 80% confluence and culture was transferred in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C with daily medium change. After washing with PBS (Sigma), cells received for 24 h BE1 medium with 2 µM CHIR99021 (Axon MedChem) and 100 ng/ml Activin A (R&D). The following 2 days, cells were cultured in BE1 supplemented with 100 ng/ml Activin A and 5 ng/ml bFGF (R&D). At DE stage, cells were maintained for three days in BE1 with 50 ng/ml FGF10 (R&D), 0.75 µM Dorsomorphin (Sigma) and 3 ng/ml Wnt3a (Peprotech) in BE1 followed by BE3 with 0.25 µM SANT-1 (Sigma), 200 nM LDN-193189 (Sigma), 2 µM Retinoic acid (Sigma), and 50 ng/ml FGF10 for three days. From day 9 to 13, cells were maintained in BE3 containing 100 ng/ml EGF (R&D), 200 nM LDN, 330 nM Indolactam V (Stem Cell Technologies) and 10 mM Nicotinamide (Sigma). MEL1 INSGFP/W were differentiated as described in the protocol published by Nair et al.17.

Immunofluorescence staining

Human ESCs differentiated on µ-Plate 24-wells (Ibidi) were used for in-well immunofluorescence staining. Cells were washed with PBS followed by fixation in 4% PFA solution for 20 min at RT. Subsequently, fixed cells were washed three times with PBS and background staining was quenched with 50 mM NH4Cl for 10 min. After washing with PBS, cells were incubated in PBS containing 0.1% Triton-X and 5% normal donkey serum (blocking) at room temperature for 45 min and subsequently, in blocking solution with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. Cells were washed twice with PBS containing 0.1% Triton-X and 2% normal donkey serum (wash solution) followed by incubation in blocking solution containing secondary antibodies at room temperature for 1.5 h. Finally, cells were washed with PBS and nuclei were stained with 500 ng/ml DAPI. Images were acquired on a Keyence Biozero BZ-9000 microscope. Antibodies used: OCT3/4 (Santa Cruz; sc-5279; 1:200), NANOG (Cell Signaling; #3580; 1:100), SOX17 (R&D; AF1924; 1:500), PDX1 (R&D; AF2419; 1:500), NKX6.1 (DSHB; F55A10 concentrate; 1:100) in combination with Alexa-conjugated secondary antibodies from Invitrogen.

Immunofluorescence staining on paraffin tissue sections

Spheres derived from MEL1 were fixed for 15 min at RT with 4% paraformaldehyde, washed in PBS and subsequently embedded in 2% agarose (Sigma). Samples were dehydrated and paraffin embedded, followed by sectioning at 5 μm thickness. For staining, rehydrated sections were treated with antigen retrieval solution (Biogenex), blocked (CAS-Block, Life Technologies with 0.2% Triton-X 100, Sigma) and incubated in primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight. After washing in PBS with 0.1% Tween20, sections were incubated with secondary antibodies for 45 min at room temperature. Finally, slides were washed in PBS-T and PBS and mounted with Vectashield. Images were acquired using a Zeiss ApoTome. The following antibodies were used: SOX17 (R&D; AF1924; 1:500), PDX1 (R&D; AF2419; 1:500), NKX6.1 (DSHB; F55A12 concentrate; 1:150), and Alexa-conjugated secondary antibodies from Invitrogen. Nuclei were visualized with DAPI.

Flow cytometry

Markers c-Kit (CD117; APC conjugated; Invitrogen; CD11705; 1:100), CXCR4 (CD184; PE conjugated; Life Technologies; MHCXCR404; 1:33), SOX17 (Alexa488 conjugated; BD Biosciences; 562205; 1:100) and FOXA2 (PE conjugated; BD Biosciences; 561589; 1:100) were quantified for definitive endoderm (DE), PDX1 (PE conjugated; BD; 562161; 1:35) and NKX6.1 (Alexa647 conjugated; BD; 563338; 1:35) were analyzed for pancreatic endoderm (PE) and pancreatic progenitor (PP) using BD LSC II flow cytometer or BD FACSAria II cell sorter with FACSDiva software version 8.0.1 (BD Biosciences) and FlowJo 10.5.0 as described by Philippi et al.16.

RNA sequencing

Total RNA was isolated from different stages of pancreatic cells using GeneJET RNA Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturer’s protocol. After quality check, up to 1 µg of total RNA with RNA integrity values (RIN) > 8 was used for poly-A enrichment followed by library preparation using the TrueSeq stranded mRNA Kit from Illumina (HUES8 n = 6, Mel1 n = 4). For HUES8, a HiSeq 3000 system (Illumina, single read, 1 × 50 bp) at the Biomedical Sequencing Facility (BSF) of the CeMM in Vienna, Austria, was used, whereas for Mel1 RNA samples a HiSeq 2500 system (Illumina, single read, 1 × 50 bp) was utilized for RNA sequencing at the Leibnitz Institute in Jena, Germany.

We used STAR aligner (Version 2.5.2b;71) to align reads on human genome hg38 with parameters as in ENCODE project. Ensembl Transcriptome Annotation e87 was used as transcriptome reference. Normalization and differential expression (DE) was performed with DESeq2 (version 1.22.1)72. We only considered further genes with more than 10 reads, an adjusted p-value < 0.05 and abs(FC) > 1. We next performed clustering of DE genes with a fuzzy c-means algorithm (R package e1071). The same approach was used for HUES8 (ESC, DE, PE, and PP stages on WT), MEL1 (ES, DE, PE, and PP), and CyT49 cells (publicly available at E-MTAB-108630).

We performed functional analysis with gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA version 3.073) to analyze genes. For this, we used the log2-fold change (FC) and the GSEAPreranked function with 1000 permutations in default settings. We manually derived genes sets from Cebola et al.22, which contains 500 pancreatic multipotent progenitor cell (MPC)-specific genes, and from Hrvatin et al.74 for endocrine development genes. We used ToppFun for Gene Ontology enrichment (FDR correction, adjusted p-value cut off at 0.5)75.

ATAC sequencing

For ATAC sequencing, differentiated pancreatic cells were harvested and 50,000 cells were directly lysed in tagmentation buffer containing TDE1 Tagment DNA enzyme, Digitonin and protease inhibitor cocktail (Nextera DNA Library Preparation Kit, Illumina). Lysates were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C and subsequently purified with the MicroElute Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Samples (n = 3) were stored at −20 °C until further processing and analysis at BSF in Vienna.

ChIP sequencing

The ChIP-IT High-Sensitivity kit (Active Motif) was utilized following the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, aggregates of pancreatic cells containing approximately 107 cells fixed for 15 min in an 11.1% formaldehyde solution were applied to chromatin extraction. Cells were lysed in a Dounce homogenizer and DNA was sheared with a Bioruptor®Plus (Diagenode) sonicator, on high for 3 × 5 min (30 s on, 30 s off). For subsequent immunoprecipitation, 10–30 μg of sheared chromatin was mixed with 4 μg primary antibody (HNF6 H-100, sc-13050, Santa Cruz; or NKX6.1 RES310, AB2024, Beta Cell Biology Consortium) and incubated over night at 4 °C on an end-to-end rotator. The chromatin-antibody solution was incubated with Protein G agarose beads for 3 h at 4 °C on the rotator and subsequently samples were processed according to the ChIP-IT High-Sensitivity instructions with an incubation at 65 °C for 2 h to reverse crosslinks and purify DNA. KAPA DNA Library Preparation Kits for Illumina® (Kapa Biosystems) were used to construct DNA libraries. For library sequencing, a HiSeq 4000 System (Illumina®) with single-end reads of 50 bp in the Institute for Genomic Medicine (IGM) core research facility at the University of California at San Diego (UCSD) was used. Additional details on the employed data sets are reported also in refs. 35,59

Bioinformatics analysis of ATAC-seq and ChIP-seq

First, we trimmed reads with skewer (Version 0.2.1;76) and next used Bowtie2 (Version;77) to align the human hg19 genome. We only considered properly mapped read pairs in ATAC-seq data. Also, we removed duplicated reads. Peak calling was performed with MACS2 (2.1.2;78) with FDR of 5%. This allowed us to find stage-specific peaks by using corresponding input DNA and replicates. For the ChIP-seq data of TFs (ONECUT1, FOXA1, FOXA2, PDX1, and NKX6.129,35), we also detected de novo motifs with MEME-ChIP (Version 4.12;79). The previous methods were also applied to publicly available histone data (H3K4me1, H3K27ac, GSE5447129 and H3K4me3, ArrayExpress E-MTAB-108630).

Only for ATAC-seq data, we also used a differential peak calling approach (THOR—Version 0.11.6;80) to detect differential peaks between consecutive steps (ESC vs. DE, DE vs. GT, GT vs. PE, and PE vs. PP). We only considered peaks with p-value < 10−5. Next, we built a peak vs. condition count matrix by merging all peaks with bedtools81 and quantification of the number of reads per peak. This matrix was first normalized by library size followed by a z-transformation (removal of mean and scaling to unit variance). Next, we grouped the peaks by clustering with fuzzy c-medoids. Pearson correlation was used as similarity metric.

We performed a footprinting analysis to dissect the regulatory program driving distinct differentiation stages. For this, we use HINT-ATAC (Version 0.11.8;14) to detect footprints at each condition (ESC, DE, GT, PE, and PP). Next, we characterized TFs associated to the footprints with motif matching with Regulatory Genomics Toolbox (RGT; JASPAR 201882 was used as a TF motif database. Next, we performed differential footprinting analysis comparing subsequent differentiation steps (ESC vs. DE, DE vs. GT, GT vs. PE, and PE vs. PP) and only considering TFs with significant changes (p-value < 0.05).

Histone and ATAC-seq heatmaps were performed with Deeptools83. We used RGT (RGT; to perform a binding enrichment test comparing gene sets with peaks. This is based on a z-score test, which tests if the number of genes close to a peak (tss +/− 20 kb) is higher than in random peaks (1000 randomizations). An intersection test84 was used to assess the overlap between two peak sets. p-values were adjusted for multiple test correction using the Bonferroni method.

Statistics and reproducibility

For RNA-seq and ATAC-seq, at least three independent experiments were performed with the number of biological replicates mentioned in figure legend. Statistical analyses were performed in R (version 4.0.2) or by the software described for each analysis test. The statistical method used for each individual analysis are described in the corresponding figure. All reported p-values based on multi-comparison tests were corrected using the Bonferroni method.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

All own sequencing data (RNA-seq, ATAC-seq, and ChIP-seq) and pre-processed files (count matrices, peaks, and genomic profiles) are deposited at Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE167606). We also provide all genomic tracks and genomic regions (peaks) from both own and public data in Zenodo ( Public available data include histome ChIP-seq (H3K4me1, H3K27ac, GSE5447129, and H3K4me3, E-MTAB-108630) and transcription factor ChIP-seq (FOXA1, FOXA2; GSE5447129; and PDX1, GSE14914835). Source data associated to figure panels are provided in the Supplementary Data 1.


  1. 1.

    Merger, S. R., Leslie, R. D. & Boehm, B. O. The broad clinical phenotype of Type 1 diabetes at presentation. Diabet. Med.30, 170–178 (2013).

    CASPubMed Google Scholar

  2. 2.

    Müller, J. A. et al. SARS-CoV-2 infects and replicates in cells of the human endocrine and exocrine pancreas. Nat. Metab.3, 149–165 (2021).

    PubMed Google Scholar

  3. 3.

    Schwitzgebel, V. M. Many faces of monogenic diabetes. J. Diabetes Investig.5, 121–133 (2014).

    PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar

  4. 4.

    Shepherd, M. et al. Systematic population screening, using biomarkers and genetic testing, identifies 2.5% of the U.K. pediatric diabetes population with monogenic diabetes. Diabetes Care39, 1879–1888 (2016).

    CASPubMed Google Scholar

  5. 5.

    Russ, H. A. et al. Controlled induction of human pancreatic progenitors produces functional beta-like cells in vitro. EMBO J.34, 1759–1772 (2015).

    CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar

  6. 6.

    Pagliuca, F. W. et al. Generation of functional human pancreatic beta cells in vitro. Cell159, 428–439 (2014).

    CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar

  7. 7.

    Rezania, A. et al. Reversal of diabetes with insulin-producing cells derived in vitro from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol.32, 1121–1133 (2014).

    CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar

  8. 8.

    Cheng, X. et al. Self-renewing endodermal progenitor lines generated from human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell10, 371–384 (2012).

    CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar

  9. 9.

    Breunig, M. et al. Modeling plasticity and dysplasia of pancreatic ductal organoids derived from human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 28, 1105–1124 (2021).

  10. 10.

    Krüger, J. et al. Drug inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 replication in human pluripotent stem cell-derived intestinal organoids. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.11, 935–948 (2021).

    PubMed Google Scholar

  11. 11.

    Hohwieler, M. et al. Human pluripotent stem cell-derived acinar/ductal organoids generate human pancreas upon orthotopic transplantation and allow disease modelling. Gut66, 473–486 (2017).

    CASPubMed Google Scholar

  12. 12.

    Wiedenmann, S. et al. Single-cell-resolved differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells into pancreatic duct-like organoids on a microwell chip. Nat. Biomed. Eng.5, 897–913 (2021).

    CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar

  13. 13.

    Hua, H. et al. iPSC-derived beta cells model diabetes due to glucokinase deficiency. J. Clin. Invest.123, 3146–3153 (2013).

    CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar

  14. 14.

    Li, Z. et al. Identification of transcription factor binding sites using ATAC-seq. Genome Biol.20, 45 (2019).

    PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar

  15. 15.

    Gusmao, E. G., Allhoff, M., Zenke, M. & Costa, I. G. Analysis of computational footprinting methods for DNase sequencing experiments. Nat. Methods13, 303–309 (2016).

    PubMed Google Scholar

  16. 16.

    Philippi, A. et al. Mutations and variants of ONECUT1 in diabetes. Nat. Med. (2021).

  17. 17.

    Nair, G. G. et al. Recapitulating endocrine cell clustering in culture promotes maturation of human stem-cell-derived β cells. Nat. Cell Biol.21, 263–274 (2019).

    CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar

  18. 18.

    Boyer, L. A. et al. Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells. Cell122, 947–956 (2005).

    CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar

  19. 19.

    Hohwieler, M., Müller, M., Frappart, P.-O. & Heller, S. Pancreatic progenitors and organoids as a prerequisite to model pancreatic diseases and cancer. Stem Cells Int. (2019).

  20. 20.

    Tiyaboonchai, A. et al. GATA6 plays an important role in the induction of human definitive endoderm, development of the pancreas, and functionality of pancreatic β cells. Stem Cell Rep.8, 589–604 (2017).

    CAS Google Scholar

  21. 21.

    Jennings, R. E., Berry, A. A., Strutt, J. P., Gerrard, D. T. & Hanley, N. A. Human pancreas development. Development142, 3126–3137 (2015).

    CASPubMed Google Scholar

  22. 22.

    Cebola, I. et al. TEAD and YAP regulate the enhancer network of human embryonic pancreatic progenitors. Nat. Cell Biol.17, 615–626 (2015).

    CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar

  23. 23.

    Gao, N. et al. Dynamic regulation of Pdx1 enhancers by Foxa1 and Foxa2 is essential for pancreas development. Genes Dev.22, 3435–3448 (2008).

    CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar

  24. 24.

    Jennings, R. E. et al. Development of the human pancreas from foregut to endocrine commitment. Diabetes62, 3514–3522 (2013).

    CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar

  25. 25.

    Cogger, K. F. et al. Glycoprotein 2 is a specific cell surface marker of human pancreatic progenitors. Nat. Commun.8, 1–13 (2017).

    CAS Google Scholar

  26. 26.

    Wang, J. et al. Prox1 activity controls pancreas morphogenesis and participates in the production of “secondary transition” pancreatic endocrine cells. Dev. Biol.286, 182–194 (2005).

    CASPubMed Google Scholar

  27. 27.

    Lyttle, B. et al. Transcription factor expression in the developing human fetal endocrine pancreas. Diabetologia51, 1169–1180 (2008).

    CASPubMed Google Scholar

  28. 28.

    Amin, S. et al. Discovery of a drug candidate for GLIS3-associated diabetes. Nat. Commun.9, 1–12 (2018).

    Google Scholar

  29. 29.

    Wang, A. et al. Epigenetic priming of enhancers predicts developmental competence of hESC-derived endodermal lineage intermediates. Cell Stem Cell16, 386–399 (2015).

    CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar

  30. 30.

    Xie, R. et al. Dynamic chromatin remodeling mediated by polycomb proteins orchestrates pancreatic differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell12, 224–237 (2013).

    CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar

  31. 31.

    Vanhorenbeeck, V. et al. Role of the Onecut transcription factors in pancreas morphogenesis and in pancreatic and enteric endocrine differentiation. Dev. Biol.305, 685–694 (2007).

    CASPubMed Google Scholar

  32. 32.

    Jacquemin, P. et al. Transcription factor hepatocyte nuclear factor 6 regulates pancreatic endocrine cell differentiation and controls expression of the proendocrine gene ngn3. Mol. Cell Biol.20, 4445–4454 (2000).

    CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar

  33. 33.

    Jacquemin, P., Lemaigre, F. P. & Rousseau, G. G. The Onecut transcription factor HNF-6 (OC-1) is required for timely specification of the pancreas and acts upstream of Pdx-1 in the specification cascade. Dev. Biol.258, 105–116 (2003).

    CASPubMed Google Scholar

  34. 34.

    Kropp, P. A., Zhu, X. & Gannon, M. Regulation of the pancreatic exocrine differentiation program and morphogenesis by Onecut 1/Hnf6. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.7, 841–856 (2019).

    PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar

  35. 35.

    Geusz, R. J. et al. Pancreatic progenitor epigenome maps prioritize type 2 diabetes risk genes with roles in development. Elife10, e59067 (2021).

  36. 36.

    McLean, C. Y. et al. GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions. Nat. Biotechnol.28, 495 (2010).

    CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar

  37. 37.

    Engel, K. L., Mackiewicz, M., Hardigan, A. A., Myers, R. M. & Savic, D. Decoding transcriptional enhancers: Evolving from annotation to functional interpretation. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol.57, 40–50 (2016).

    CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar

  38. 38.

    Schneider, R. et al. Histone H3 lysine 4 methylation patterns in higher eukaryotic genes. Nat. Cell Biol.6, 73–77 (2004).

    CASPubMed Google Scholar

  39. 39.

    Heintzman, N. D. et al. Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression. Nature459, 108–112 (2009).

    CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar

  40. 40.

    Rada-Iglesias, A. et al. A unique chromatin signature uncovers early developmental enhancers in humans. Nature470, 279–283 (2011).

    CAS Google Scholar

  41. 41.

    Creyghton, M. P. et al. Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA107, 21931–21936 (2010).

    CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar

  42. 42.

    Calo, E. & Wysocka, J. Modification of enhancer chromatin: what, how, and why? Mol. Cell49, 825–837 (2013).

    CASPubMed Google Scholar

  43. 43.

    Ernst, J. & Kellis, M. Chromatin-state discovery and genome annotation with ChromHMM. Nat. Protoc.12, 2478–2492 (2017).




Portmanteau for malicious software

Malware (a portmanteau for malicious software) is any software intentionally designed to cause damage to a computer, server, client, or computer network.[1][2] By contrast, software that causes unintentional harm due to some deficiency is typically described as a software bug.[3] A wide variety of malware types exist, including computer viruses, worms, Trojan horses, ransomware, spyware, adware, rogue software, wiper and scareware.

Programs are also considered malware if they secretly act against the interests of the computer user. For example, at one point, Sony BMG compact discs silently installed a rootkit on purchasers' computers with the intention of preventing illicit copying, but which also reported on users' listening habits, and unintentionally created extra security vulnerabilities.[4]

A range of antivirus software, firewalls and other strategies are used to help protect against the introduction of malware, to help detect it if it is already present, and to recover from malware-associated malicious activity and attacks.[5]


This pie chart shows that in 2011, 70% of malware infections were by Trojan horses, 17% were from viruses, 8% from worms, with the remaining percentages divided among adware, backdoor, spyware, and other exploits.

Many early infectious programs, including the first Internet Worm, were written as experiments or pranks.[6] Today, malware is used by both black hat hackers and governments to steal personal, financial, or business information.[7][8]

Malware is sometimes used broadly against government or corporate websites to gather guarded information,[9] or to disrupt their operation in general. However, malware can be used against individuals to gain information such as personal identification numbers or details, bank or credit card numbers, and passwords.

Since the rise of widespread broadbandInternet access, malicious software has more frequently been designed for profit. Since 2003, the majority of widespread viruses and worms have been designed to take control of users' computers for illicit purposes.[10] Infected "zombie computers" can be used to send email spam, to host contraband data such as child pornography,[11] or to engage in distributed denial-of-serviceattacks as a form of extortion.[12]

Programs designed to monitor users' web browsing, display unsolicited advertisements, or redirect affiliate marketing revenues are called spyware. Spyware programs do not spread like viruses; instead they are generally installed by exploiting security holes. They can also be hidden and packaged together with unrelated user-installed software.[13] The Sony BMG rootkit was intended to prevent illicit copying; but also reported on users' listening habits, and unintentionally created extra security vulnerabilities.[4]

Ransomware affects an infected computer system in some way, and demands payment to bring it back to its normal state. There are two variations of ransomware, being crypto ransomware and locker ransomware.[14] Locker ransomware just locks down a computer system without encrypting its contents, whereas the traditional ransomware is one that locks down a system and encrypts its contents. For example, programs such as CryptoLockerencrypt files securely, and only decrypt them on payment of a substantial sum of money.[15]

Some malware is used to generate money by click fraud, making it appear that the computer user has clicked an advertising link on a site, generating a payment from the advertiser. It was estimated in 2012 that about 60 to 70% of all active malware used some kind of click fraud, and 22% of all ad-clicks were fraudulent.[16]

In addition to criminal money-making, malware can be used for sabotage, often for political motives. Stuxnet, for example, was designed to disrupt very specific industrial equipment. There have been politically motivated attacks which spread over and shut down large computer networks, including massive deletion of files and corruption of master boot records, described as "computer killing." Such attacks were made on Sony Pictures Entertainment (25 November 2014, using malware known as Shamoon or W32.Disttrack) and Saudi Aramco (August 2012).[17][18]

Infectious malware[edit]

Main articles: Computer virus and Computer worm

The best-known types of malware, viruses and worms, are known for the manner in which they spread, rather than any specific types of behavior. A computer virus is software that embeds itself in some other executable software (including the operating system itself) on the target system without the user's knowledge and consent and when it is run, the virus is spread to other executables. On the other hand, a worm is a stand-alone malware software that actively transmits itself over a network to infect other computers and can copy itself without infecting files. These definitions lead to the observation that a virus requires the user to run an infected software or operating system for the virus to spread, whereas a worm spreads itself.[19]


These categories are not mutually exclusive, so malware may use multiple techniques.[20] This section only applies to malware designed to operate undetected, not sabotage and ransomware.

See also: Polymorphic packer


Main article: Computer virus

A computer virus is software usually hidden within another seemingly innocuous program that can produce copies of itself and insert them into other programs or files, and that usually performs a harmful action (such as destroying data).[21] An example of this is a PE infection, a technique, usually used to spread malware, that inserts extra data or executable code into PE files.[22]

Screen-locking ransomware[edit]

Main article: Ransomware

Lock-screens, or screen lockers is a type of “cyber police” ransomware that blocks screens on Windows or Android devices with a false accusation in harvesting illegal content, trying to scare the victims into paying up a fee.[23] Jisut and SLocker impact Android devices more than other lock-screens, with Jisut making up nearly 60 percent of all Android ransomware detections.[24]

Encryption-based ransomware[edit]

Main article: Ransomware

Encryption-based ransomware, like the name suggests, is a type of ransomware that encrypts all files on an infected machine. These types of malware then display a pop-up informing the user that their files have been encrypted and that they must pay (usually in Bitcoin) to recover them. Some examples of encryption-based ransomware are CryptoLocker and WannaCry. [25]

Trojan horses[edit]

Main article: Trojan horse (computing)

A Trojan horse is a harmful program that misrepresents itself to masquerade as a regular, benign program or utility in order to persuade a victim to install it. A Trojan horse usually carries a hidden destructive function that is activated when the application is started. The term is derived from the Ancient Greek story of the Trojan horse used to invade the city of Troy by stealth.[26][27][28][29][30]

Trojan horses are generally spread by some form of social engineering, for example, where a user is duped into executing an email attachment disguised to be unsuspicious, (e.g., a routine form to be filled in), or by drive-by download. Although their payload can be anything, many modern forms act as a backdoor, contacting a controller (phoning home) which can then have unauthorized access to the affected computer, potentially installing additional software such as a keylogger to steal confidential information, cryptomining software or adware to generate revenue to the operator of the trojan.[31] While Trojan horses and backdoors are not easily detectable by themselves, computers may appear to run slower, emit more heat or fan noise due to heavy processor or network usage, as may occur when cryptomining software is installed. Cryptominers may limit resource usage and/or only run during idle times in an attempt to evade detection.

Unlike computer viruses and worms, Trojan horses generally do not attempt to inject themselves into other files or otherwise propagate themselves.[32]

In spring 2017 Mac users were hit by the new version of Proton Remote Access Trojan (RAT)[33] trained to extract password data from various sources, such as browser auto-fill data, the Mac-OS keychain, and password vaults.[34]


Main article: Rootkit

Once malicious software is installed on a system, it is essential that it stays concealed, to avoid detection. Software packages known as rootkits allow this concealment, by modifying the host's operating system so that the malware is hidden from the user. Rootkits can prevent a harmful process from being visible in the system's list of processes, or keep its files from being read.[35]

Some types of harmful software contain routines to evade identification and/or removal attempts, not merely to hide themselves. An early example of this behavior is recorded in the Jargon File tale of a pair of programs infesting a Xerox CP-V time sharing system:

Each ghost-job would detect the fact that the other had been killed, and would start a new copy of the recently stopped program within a few milliseconds. The only way to kill both ghosts was to kill them simultaneously (very difficult) or to deliberately crash the system.[36]


Main article: Backdoor (computing)

A backdoor is a method of bypassing normal authentication procedures, usually over a connection to a network such as the Internet. Once a system has been compromised, one or more backdoors may be installed in order to allow access in the future,[37] invisibly to the user.

The idea has often been suggested that computer manufacturers preinstall backdoors on their systems to provide technical support for customers, but this has never been reliably verified. It was reported in 2014 that US government agencies had been diverting computers purchased by those considered "targets" to secret workshops where software or hardware permitting remote access by the agency was installed, considered to be among the most productive operations to obtain access to networks around the world.[38] Backdoors may be installed by Trojan horses, worms, implants, or other methods.[39][40]


Since the beginning of 2015, a sizable portion of malware has been utilizing a combination of many techniques designed to avoid detection and analysis.[41] From the more common, to the least common:

  1. evasion of analysis and detection by fingerprinting the environment when executed.[42]
  2. confusing automated tools' detection methods. This allows malware to avoid detection by technologies such as signature-based antivirus software by changing the server used by the malware.[43]
  3. timing-based evasion. This is when malware runs at certain times or following certain actions taken by the user, so it executes during certain vulnerable periods, such as during the boot process, while remaining dormant the rest of the time.
  4. obfuscating internal data so that automated tools do not detect the malware.[44]

An increasingly common technique (2015) is adware that uses stolen certificates to disable anti-malware and virus protection; technical remedies are available to deal with the adware.[45]

Nowadays, one of the most sophisticated and stealthy ways of evasion is to use information hiding techniques, namely stegomalware. A survey on stegomalware was published by Cabaj et al. in 2018.[46]

Another type of evasion technique is Fileless malware or Advanced Volatile Threats (AVTs). Fileless malware does not require a file to operate. It runs within memory and utilizes existing system tools to carry out malicious acts. Because there are no files on the system, there are no executable files for antivirus and forensic tools to analyze, making such malware nearly impossible to detect. The only way to detect fileless malware is to catch it operating in real time. Recently these types of attacks have become more frequent with a 432% increase in 2017 and makeup 35% of the attacks in 2018. Such attacks are not easy to perform but are becoming more prevalent with the help of exploit-kits. [47][48]


Main article: Vulnerability (computing)

  • In this context, and throughout, what is called the "system" under attack may be anything from a single application, through a complete computer and operating system, to a large network.
  • Various factors make a system more vulnerable to malware:

Security defects in software[edit]

Malware exploits security defects (security bugs or vulnerabilities) in the design of the operating system, in applications (such as browsers, e.g. older versions of Microsoft Internet Explorer supported by Windows XP[49]), or in vulnerable versions of browser plugins such as Adobe Flash Player, Adobe Acrobat or Reader, or Java SE.[50][51] Sometimes even installing new versions of such plugins does not automatically uninstall old versions. Security advisories from plug-in providers announce security-related updates.[52] Common vulnerabilities are assigned CVE IDs and listed in the US National Vulnerability Database. Secunia PSI[53] is an example of software, free for personal use, that will check a PC for vulnerable out-of-date software, and attempt to update it.

Malware authors target bugs, or loopholes, to exploit. A common method is exploitation of a buffer overrun vulnerability, where software designed to store data in a specified region of memory does not prevent more data than the buffer can accommodate being supplied. Malware may provide data that overflows the buffer, with malicious executable code or data after the end; when this payload is accessed it does what the attacker, not the legitimate software, determines.

Anti-malware is a continuously growing threat to malware detection.[54] According to Symantec’s 2018 Internet Security Threat Report (ISTR), malware variants number has got up to 669,947,865 in 2017, which is the double of malware variants in 2016.[54]

Insecure design or user error[edit]

Early PCs had to be booted from floppy disks. When built-in hard drives became common, the operating system was normally started from them, but it was possible to boot from another boot device if available, such as a floppy disk, CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, USB flash drive or network. It was common to configure the computer to boot from one of these devices when available. Normally none would be available; the user would intentionally insert, say, a CD into the optical drive to boot the computer in some special way, for example, to install an operating system. Even without booting, computers can be configured to execute software on some media as soon as they become available, e.g. to autorun a CD or USB device when inserted.

Malware distributors would trick the user into booting or running from an infected device or medium. For example, a virus could make an infected computer add autorunnable code to any USB stick plugged into it. Anyone who then attached the stick to another computer set to autorun from USB would in turn become infected, and also pass on the infection in the same way.[55] More generally, any device that plugs into a USB port – even lights, fans, speakers, toys, or peripherals such as a digital microscope – can be used to spread malware. Devices can be infected during manufacturing or supply if quality control is inadequate.[55]

This form of infection can largely be avoided by setting up computers by default to boot from the internal hard drive, if available, and not to autorun from devices.[55] Intentional booting from another device is always possible by pressing certain keys during boot.

Older email software would automatically open HTML email containing potentially malicious JavaScript code. Users may also execute disguised malicious email attachments. The 2018 Data Breach Investigations Report by Verizon, cited by CSO Online, states that emails are the primary method of malware delivery, accounting for 92% of malware delivery around the world.[56][57]

Over-privileged users and over-privileged code[edit]

Main article: principle of least privilege

In computing, privilege refers to how much a user or program is allowed to modify a system. In poorly designed computer systems, both users and programs can be assigned more privileges than they should have, and malware can take advantage of this. The two ways that malware does this is through overprivileged users and overprivileged code.[citation needed]

Some systems allow all users to modify their internal structures, and such users today would be considered over-privileged users. This was the standard operating procedure for early microcomputer and home computer systems, where there was no distinction between an administrator or root, and a regular user of the system. In some systems, non-administrator users are over-privileged by design, in the sense that they are allowed to modify internal structures of the system. In some environments, users are over-privileged because they have been inappropriately granted administrator or equivalent status.[58]

Some systems allow code executed by a user to access all rights of that user, which is known as over-privileged code. This was also standard operating procedure for early microcomputer and home computer systems. Malware, running as over-privileged code, can use this privilege to subvert the system. Almost all currently popular operating systems, and also many scripting applications allow code too many privileges, usually in the sense that when a user executes code, the system allows that code all rights of that user. This makes users vulnerable to malware in the form of email attachments, which may or may not be disguised.[citation needed]

Use of the same operating system[edit]

Homogeneity can be a vulnerability. For example, when all computers in a network run the same operating system, upon exploiting one, one worm can exploit them all:[59] In particular, Microsoft Windows or Mac OS X have such a large share of the market that an exploited vulnerability concentrating on either operating system could subvert a large number of systems. Introducing diversity purely for the sake of robustness, such as adding Linux computers, could increase short-term costs for training and maintenance. However, as long as all the nodes are not part of the same directory service for authentication, having a few diverse nodes could deter total shutdown of the network and allow those nodes to help with recovery of the infected nodes. Such separate, functional redundancy could avoid the cost of a total shutdown, at the cost of increased complexity and reduced usability in terms of single sign-on authentication.[citation needed]

Anti-malware strategies[edit]

Main article: Antivirus software

As malware attacks become more frequent, attention has begun to shift from viruses and spyware protection, to malware protection, and programs that have been specifically developed to combat malware. (Other preventive and recovery measures, such as backup and recovery methods, are mentioned in the computer virus article). Reboot to restore software is also useful for mitigating malware by rolling back malicious alterations.

Antivirus and anti-malware software[edit]

A specific component of antivirus and anti-malware software, commonly referred to as an on-access or real-time scanner, hooks deep into the operating system's core or kernel and functions in a manner similar to how certain malware itself would attempt to operate, though with the user's informed permission for protecting the system. Any time the operating system accesses a file, the on-access scanner checks if the file is a 'legitimate' file or not. If the file is identified as malware by the scanner, the access operation will be stopped, the file will be dealt with by the scanner in a pre-defined way (how the antivirus program was configured during/post installation), and the user will be notified.[citation needed] This may have a considerable performance impact on the operating system, though the degree of impact is dependent on how well the scanner was programmed. The goal is to stop any operations the malware may attempt on the system before they occur, including activities which might exploit bugs or trigger unexpected operating system behavior.

Anti-malware programs can combat malware in two ways:

  1. They can provide real time protection against the installation of malware software on a computer. This type of malware protection works the same way as that of antivirus protection in that the anti-malware software scans all incoming network data for malware and blocks any threats it comes across.
  2. Anti-malware software programs can be used solely for detection and removal of malware software that has already been installed onto a computer. This type of anti-malware software scans the contents of the Windows registry, operating system files, and installed programs on a computer and will provide a list of any threats found, allowing the user to choose which files to delete or keep, or to compare this list to a list of known malware components, removing files that match.[60]

Real-time protection from malware works identically to real-time antivirus protection: the software scans disk files at download time, and blocks the activity of components known to represent malware. In some cases, it may also intercept attempts to install start-up items or to modify browser settings. Because many malware components are installed as a result of browser exploits or user error, using security software (some of which are anti-malware, though many are not) to "sandbox" browsers (essentially isolate the browser from the computer and hence any malware induced change) can also be effective in helping to restrict any damage done.[61]

Examples of Microsoft Windows antivirus and anti-malware software include the optional Microsoft Security Essentials[62] (for Windows XP, Vista, and Windows 7) for real-time protection, the Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool[63] (now included with Windows (Security) Updates on "Patch Tuesday", the second Tuesday of each month), and Windows Defender (an optional download in the case of Windows XP, incorporating MSE functionality in the case of Windows 8 and later).[64] Additionally, several capable antivirus software programs are available for free download from the Internet (usually restricted to non-commercial use).[65] Tests found some free programs to be competitive with commercial ones.[65][66][67] Microsoft's System File Checker can be used to check for and repair corrupted system files.

Some viruses disable System Restore and other important Windows tools such as Task Manager and Command Prompt. Many such viruses can be removed by rebooting the computer, entering Windows safe mode with networking,[68] and then using system tools or Microsoft Safety Scanner.[69]

Hardware implants can be of any type, so there can be no general way to detect them.

Website security scans[edit]

As malware also harms the compromised websites (by breaking reputation, blacklisting in search engines, etc.), some websites offer vulnerability scanning.[70] Such scans check the website, detect malware, may note outdated software, and may report known security issues.

"Air gap" isolation or "parallel network"[edit]

As a last resort, computers can be protected from malware, and infected computers can be prevented from disseminating trusted information, by imposing an "air gap" (i.e. completely disconnecting them from all other networks). However, malware can still cross the air gap in some situations. Stuxnet is an example of malware that is introduced to the target environment via a USB drive.

AirHopper,[71] BitWhisper,[72] GSMem [73] and Fansmitter[74] are four techniques introduced by researchers that can leak data from air-gapped computers using electromagnetic, thermal and acoustic emissions.


See also: Privacy-invasive software and Potentially unwanted program

Grayware (sometimes spelled as greyware) is a term applied to unwanted applications or files that are not classified as malware, but can worsen the performance of computers and may cause security risks.[75]

It describes applications that behave in an annoying or undesirable manner, and yet are less serious or troublesome than malware. Grayware encompasses spyware, adware, fraudulent dialers, joke programs, remote access tools and other unwanted programs that may harm the performance of computers or cause inconvenience. The term came into use around 2004.[76]

Another term, potentially unwanted program (PUP) or potentially unwanted application (PUA),[77] refers to applications that would be considered unwanted despite often having been downloaded by the user, possibly after failing to read a download agreement. PUPs include spyware, adware, and fraudulent dialers. Many security products classify unauthorised key generators as grayware, although they frequently carry true malware in addition to their ostensible purpose.

Software maker Malwarebytes lists several criteria for classifying a program as a PUP.[78] Some types of adware (using stolen certificates) turn off anti-malware and virus protection; technical remedies are available.[45]


Main article: History of computer viruses

See also: History of ransomware

Further information: Timeline of computer viruses and worms

Before Internet access became widespread, viruses spread on personal computers by infecting executable programs or boot sectors of floppy disks. By inserting a copy of itself into the machine code instructions in these programs or boot sectors, a virus causes itself to be run whenever the program is run or the disk is booted. Early computer viruses were written for the Apple II and Macintosh, but they became more widespread with the dominance of the IBM PC and MS-DOS system. The first IBM PC virus in the "wild" was a boot sector virus dubbed (c)Brain,[79] created in 1986 by the Farooq Alvi brothers in Pakistan.[80]

The first worms, network-borne infectious programs, originated not on personal computers, but on multitasking Unix systems. The first well-known worm was the Internet Worm of 1988, which infected SunOS and VAXBSD systems. Unlike a virus, this worm did not insert itself into other programs. Instead, it exploited security holes (vulnerabilities) in network server programs and started itself running as a separate process.[81] This same behavior is used by today's worms as well.[82][83]

With the rise of the Microsoft Windows platform in the 1990s, and the flexible macros of its applications, it became possible to write infectious code in the macro language of Microsoft Word and similar programs. These macro viruses infect documents and templates rather than applications (executables), but rely on the fact that macros in a Word document are a form of executable code.[84]

Academic research[edit]

Main article: Malware research

The notion of a self-reproducing computer program can be traced back to initial theories about the operation of complex automata.[85]John von Neumann showed that in theory a program could reproduce itself. This constituted a plausibility result in computability theory. Fred Cohen experimented with computer viruses and confirmed Neumann's postulate and investigated other properties of malware such as detectability and self-obfuscation using rudimentary encryption. His 1987 doctoral dissertation was on the subject of computer viruses.[86] The combination of cryptographic technology as part of the payload of the virus, exploiting it for attack purposes was initialized and investigated from the mid 1990s, and includes initial ransomware and evasion ideas.[87]

See also[edit]


  1. ^"Defining Malware: FAQ". Retrieved 10 September 2009.
  2. ^"An Undirected Attack Against Critical Infrastructure"(PDF). United States Computer Emergency Readiness Team( Retrieved 28 September 2014.
  3. ^Klein, Tobias (11 October 2011). A Bug Hunter's Diary: A Guided Tour Through the Wilds of Software Security. No Starch Press. ISBN .
  4. ^ abRussinovich, Mark (31 October 2005). "Sony, Rootkits and Digital Rights Management Gone Too Far". Mark's Blog. Microsoft MSDN. Retrieved 29 July 2009.
  5. ^"Protect Your Computer from Malware". 11 October 2012. Retrieved 26 August 2013.
  6. ^Tipton, Harold F. (26 December 2002). Information Security Management Handbook. CRC Press. ISBN .
  7. ^"Malware". FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION- CONSUMER INFORMATION. Retrieved 27 March 2014.
  8. ^Hernandez, Pedro. "Microsoft Vows to Combat Government Cyber-Spying". eWeek. Retrieved 15 December 2013.
  9. ^Kovacs, Eduard (27 February 2013). "MiniDuke Malware Used Against European Government Organizations". Softpedia. Retrieved 27 February 2013.
  10. ^"Malware Revolution: A Change in Target". March 2007.
  11. ^"Child Porn: Malware's Ultimate Evil". November 2009.
  12. ^PC World – Zombie PCs: Silent, Growing Threat.
  13. ^"Peer To Peer Information". NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY. Retrieved 25 March 2011.
  14. ^Richardson, Ronny; North, Max (1 January 2017). "Ransomware: Evolution, Mitigation and Prevention". International Management Review. 13 (1): 10–21.
  15. ^Fruhlinger, Josh (1 August 2017). "The 5 biggest ransomware attacks of the last 5 years". CSO. Retrieved 23 March 2018.
  16. ^"Another way Microsoft is disrupting the malware ecosystem". Archived from the original on 20 September 2015. Retrieved 18 February 2015.
  17. ^"Shamoon is latest malware to target energy sector". Retrieved 18 February 2015.
  18. ^"Computer-killing malware used in Sony attack a wake-up call". Retrieved 18 February 2015.
  19. ^"computer virus – Encyclopædia Britannica". Retrieved 28 April 2013.
  20. ^"All about Malware and Information Privacy - TechAcute". 31 August 2014.
  21. ^"What are viruses, worms, and Trojan horses?". Indiana University. The Trustees of Indiana University. Retrieved 23 February 2015.
  22. ^Peter Szor (3 February 2005). The Art of Computer Virus Research and Defense. Pearson Education. p. 204. ISBN .
  23. ^"Rise of Android Ransomware, research"(PDF). ESET.
  24. ^"State of Malware, research"(PDF). Malwarebytes.
  25. ^O'Kane, P., Sezer, S. and Carlin, D. (2018), Evolution of ransomware. IET Netw., 7: 321-327.
  26. ^Landwehr, C. E; A. R Bull; J. P McDermott; W. S Choi (1993). A taxonomy of computer program security flaws, with examples. DTIC Document. Retrieved 5 April 2012.
  27. ^"Trojan Horse Definition". Retrieved 5 April 2012.
  28. ^"Trojan horse". Webopedia. Retrieved 5 April 2012.
  29. ^"What is Trojan horse? – Definition from". Retrieved 5 April 2012.
  30. ^"Trojan Horse: [coined By MIT-hacker-turned-NSA-spook Dan Edwards] N." Archived from the original on 5 July 2017. Retrieved 5 April 2012.
  31. ^"What is the difference between viruses, worms, and Trojan horses?". Symantec Corporation. Retrieved 10 January 2009.
  32. ^"VIRUS-L/comp.virus Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) v2.00 (Question B3: What is a Trojan Horse?)". 9 October 1995. Retrieved 13 September 2012.
  33. ^"Proton Mac Trojan Has Apple Code Signing Signatures Sold to Customers for $50k". AppleInsider.
  34. ^"Non-Windows Malware". Betanews. 24 August 2017.
  35. ^McDowell, Mindi. "Understanding Hidden Threats: Rootkits and Botnets". US-CERT. Retrieved 6 February 2013.
  36. ^"The Meaning of 'Hack'". Retrieved 15 April 2010.
  37. ^Vincentas (11 July 2013). "Malware in". Spyware Loop. Retrieved 28 July 2013.
  38. ^Staff, SPIEGEL (29 December 2013). "Inside TAO: Documents Reveal Top NSA Hacking Unit". Spiegel Online. SPIEGEL. Retrieved 23 January 2014.
  39. ^Edwards, John. "Top Zombie, Trojan Horse and Bot Threats". IT Security. Archived from the original on 9 February 2017. Retrieved 25 September 2007.
  40. ^Appelbaum, Jacob (29 December 2013). "Shopping for Spy Gear:Catalog Advertises NSA Toolbox". Spiegel Online. SPIEGEL. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
  41. ^"Evasive malware goes mainstream - Help Net Security". 22 April 2015.
  42. ^Kirat, Dhilung; Vigna, Giovanni; Kruegel, Christopher (2014). Barecloud: bare-metal analysis-based evasive malware detection. ACM. pp. 287–301. ISBN .
    Freely accessible at: "Barecloud: bare-metal analysis-based evasive malware detection"(PDF).
  43. ^The Four Most Common Evasive Techniques Used by Malware. 27 April 2015.
  44. ^Young, Adam; Yung, Moti (1997). "Deniable Password Snatching: On the Possibility of Evasive Electronic Espionage". Symp. on Security and Privacy. IEEE. pp. 224–235. ISBN .
  45. ^ abCasey, Henry T. (25 November 2015). "Latest adware disables antivirus software". Tom's Guide. Retrieved 25 November 2015.
  46. ^Cabaj, Krzysztof; Caviglione, Luca; Mazurczyk, Wojciech; Wendzel, Steffen; Woodward, Alan; Zander, Sebastian (May 2018). "The New Threats of Information Hiding: The Road Ahead". IT Professional. 20 (3): 31–39. arXiv:1801.00694. doi:10.1109/MITP.2018.032501746. S2CID 22328658.
  47. ^"Penn State WebAccess Secure Login". doi:10.1145/3365001. Retrieved 29 February 2020.
  48. ^"Malware Dynamic Analysis Evasion Techniques: A Survey". ResearchGate. Retrieved 29 February 2020.
  49. ^"Global Web Browser... Security Trends"(PDF). Kaspersky lab. November 2012.
  50. ^Rashid, Fahmida Y. (27 November 2012). "Updated Browsers Still Vulnerable to Attack if Plugins Are Outdated". Archived from the original on 9 April 2016. Retrieved 17 January 2013.
  51. ^Danchev, Dancho (18 August 2011). "Kaspersky: 12 different vulnerabilities detected on every PC".
  52. ^"Adobe Security bulletins and advisories". Retrieved 19 January 2013.
  53. ^Rubenking, Neil J. "Secunia Personal Software Inspector 3.0 Review & Rating". Retrieved 19 January 2013.
  54. ^ abXiao, Fei; Sun, Yi; Du, Donggao; Li, Xuelei; Luo, Min (21 March 2020). "A Novel Malware Classification Method Based on Crucial Behavior". Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2020: 1–12. doi:10.1155/2020/6804290. ISSN 1024-123X.
  55. ^ abc"USB devices spreading viruses". CNET. CBS Interactive. Retrieved 18 February 2015.
  56. ^
  57. ^Fruhlinger, Josh (10 October 2018). "Top cybersecurity facts, figures and statistics for 2018". CSO Online. Retrieved 20 January 2020.
  58. ^"Malware, viruses, worms, Trojan horses and spyware". Retrieved 14 November 2020.
  59. ^"LNCS 3786 – Key Factors Influencing Worm Infection", U. Kanlayasiri, 2006, web (PDF): SL40-PDF.
  60. ^"How Antivirus Software Works?". Retrieved 16 October 2015.
  61. ^Souppaya, Murugiah; Scarfone, Karen (July 2013). "Guide to Malware Incident Prevention and Handling for Desktops and Laptops". National Institute of Standards and Technology. doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-83r1.
  62. ^"Microsoft Security Essentials". Microsoft. Retrieved 21 June 2012.
  63. ^"Malicious Software Removal Tool". Microsoft. Archived from the original on 21 June 2012. Retrieved 21 June 2012.
  64. ^"Windows Defender". Microsoft. Archived from the original on 22 June 2012. Retrieved 21 June 2012.
  65. ^ abRubenking, Neil J. (8 January 2014). "The Best Free Antivirus for 2014".
  66. ^"Free antivirus profiles in 2018". Archived from the original on 10 August 2018. Retrieved 13 February 2020.
  67. ^"Quickly identify malware running on your PC".
  68. ^"How do I remove a computer virus?". Microsoft. Retrieved 26 August 2013.
  69. ^"Microsoft Safety Scanner". Microsoft. Retrieved 26 August 2013.
  70. ^"Example Safe Browsing Diagnostic page". Retrieved 19 January 2013.
  71. ^M. Guri, G. Kedma, A. Kachlon and Y. Elovici, "AirHopper: Bridging the air-gap between isolated networks and mobile phones using radio frequencies," Malicious and Unwanted Software: The Americas (MALWARE), 2014 9th International Conference on, Fajardo, PR, 2014, pp. 58-67.
  72. ^M. Guri, M. Monitz, Y. Mirski and Y. Elovici, "BitWhisper: Covert Signaling Channel between Air-Gapped Computers Using Thermal Manipulations," 2015 IEEE 28th Computer Security Foundations Symposium, Verona, 2015, pp. 276-289.
  73. ^GSMem: Data Exfiltration from Air-Gapped Computers over GSM Frequencies. Mordechai Guri, Assaf Kachlon, Ofer Hasson, Gabi Kedma, Yisroel Mirsky, and Yuval Elovici, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; USENIX Security Symposium 2015
  74. ^Hanspach, Michael; Goetz, Michael; Daidakulov, Andrey; Elovici, Yuval (2016). "Fansmitter: Acoustic Data Exfiltration from (Speakerless) Air-Gapped Computers". arXiv:1606.05915 [cs.CR].
  75. ^Vincentas (11 July 2013). "Grayware in". Spyware Loop. Archived from the original on 15 July 2014. Retrieved 28 July 2013.
  76. ^"Threat Encyclopedia – Generic Grayware". Trend Micro. Retrieved 27 November 2012.
  77. ^"Rating the best anti-malware solutions". Arstechnica. 15 December 2009. Retrieved 28 January 2014.
  78. ^"PUP Criteria". Retrieved 13 February 2015.
  79. ^"Boot sector virus repair". 10 June 2010. Archived from the original on 12 January 2011. Retrieved 27 August 2010.
  80. ^Avoine, Gildas; Pascal Junod; Philippe Oechslin (2007). Computer system security: basic concepts and solved exercises. EFPL Press. p. 20. ISBN .
  81. ^William A Hendric (4 September 2014). "Computer Virus history". The Register. Retrieved 29 March 2015.
  82. ^"Cryptomining Worm MassMiner Exploits Multiple Vulnerabilities - Security Boulevard". Security Boulevard. 2 May 2018. Retrieved 9 May 2018.
  83. ^"Malware: Types, Protection, Prevention, Detection & Removal - Ultimate Guide". EasyTechGuides.
  84. ^"Beware of Word Document Viruses". Retrieved 25 September 2017.
  85. ^John von Neumann, "Theory of Self-Reproducing Automata", Part 1: Transcripts of lectures given at the University of Illinois, December 1949, Editor: A. W. Burks, University of Illinois, USA, 1966.
  86. ^Fred Cohen, "Computer Viruses", PhD Thesis, University of Southern California, ASP Press, 1988.
  87. ^Young, Adam; Yung, Moti (2004). Malicious cryptography - exposing cryptovirology. Wiley. pp. 1–392. ISBN .

External links[edit]

Look up malware in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Malware.
PE Explorer crack

PE Explorer Torrent Crack With Registration Code

PE Explorer Crack Keygen is the most comprehensive program to examine the internal behavior of proprietary software and, most importantly, third-party applications and libraries that do not have source code.

The PE Explorer 2021 Crack opens a variety of 32-bit executable file types (also known as PE files), common such as EXE, DLL, ActiveX to lesser-known types such as SCR You can view and edit screensaver), CPL (Applet Control Panel), SYS, MSSTYLES, BPL, DPL, etc. (including executable files running on MS Windows Mobile platforms).

PE Explorer Crack Free Download also examines the inside of these binary PE files, performs static analysis, reveals as much information about the functionality of the executable file, and collects as much information about the executable file as possible. Drag and drop the suspect file, potential malware, or whatever else onto the program and a left-hand tree lists some of its structures: DOS Header, NT Header, Section Headers, assorted directory entries, and more.

PE Explorer 1.99 R6 Crack Activation Code

Once inside, you can analyze and optimize file structure, diagnose problems, make changes, and repair resources. Even if you are an advanced computer user, PE Explorer is a software solution that makes it easy to find the answer, even if the executable file is ticked or you suffer from a program error that is difficult for developers to find. With Explorer Explorer, you can also view, edit, and repair the internal structure of PE files at the touch of a button.

Works with PE formats such as EXE, DLL, MSSTYLES, SYS, OCX, SCR, and other executable win32. Support for custom plugins. Serious development projects, restoring lost information, complete retention of damaged files, determining the presence of viruses or malware in programs, reverse engineering of projects with missing source code, import template / dll is used to display exports.

PE Explorer crack

PE Explorer Crack Features:

  • Advanced visual resource viewers and editors
  • Analyze, diagnose problems, repair and restore
  • Automatically unpacks and decompresses files
  • Edit apps properties and controls forms easily
  • Examine PE file headers and correct checksums
  • Extremely safe and easy-to-use resource editors
  • Generate a lot of information about binary files
  • View a certificate-based digital signature file
  • Work with damaged files or compressed files
  • Function syntax lookup displays, and many more.

PE Viewers Main Features

  • Headers Info Viewer displays the EXE header information contained in the PE file header.
  • Data Directories Viewer to view and edit Data Directories.
  • Sections Header Viewer to view, extract, recalculate, or delete sections from the program body.
  • Export, Import, and Delay Import Viewers.
  • Function Syntax Viewer displays the calling syntax for functions.
  • Digital Signature Viewer to validate the digital signature of a PE file.
  • Dependency Scanner traces the dependency chain for the program’s libraries.
  • Relocation Viewer to view contents of the base relocation table.
  • Debug Information Viewer displays the debug information contained in the file.
  • Resource Viewer to browse, delete, or extract nearly every type of resource.

PE Editors Features

  • Resource Editor to edit or replace nearly every type of resource.
  • Application Manifest Wizard for adding the manifest resource into existing applications and marking applications with a requested execution level to tell Vista to run the applications elevated.
  • Characteristics Editor to view or set flag bits in the PE file header Characteristics field.
  • Section Editor to change all the fields in the section header, or repair and restore the damaged section headers settings.
  • Also, Customize the GUI elements of your favorite Windows programs
  • Track down what a program accesses and which DLLs are called
  • Understand the way a program works, behaves, and interacts with others
  • Syntax Description Editor for adding custom comments, altering values, or creating new library descriptions.
  • Debug Information and Relocations Removal Tools
  • TimeDateStamp Adjuster to modify all the timestamps in the PE file header to one uniform value.
PE Explorer crack

What’s New In PE Explorer Crack?

  1. It supports all plugins.
  2. It has an Advanced visual resource viewer & editor.
  3. It can diagnose problems.

How to install and activate:

  • Disconnect from the internet (most recommended)
  • Unpack and install the software (launch setup)
  • Do not launch the program yet, exit if running
  • Copy Cracked and license file to installation dir
  • Or just extract and launch the portable version
  • Never update and always block in your firewall

You may also like to download Genymotion Crack is a faster and lightweight emulator


ベルーフ (Beruf) ライト LEDモーションセンサーヘッドライト 150ルーメン 電池式 BHL-L06SDB 87669

ベルーフ Beruf ライト LEDモーションセンサーヘッドライト 150ルーメン 電池式 BHL-L06SDB 87669 ベルーフ Beruf ライト LEDモーションセンサーヘッドライト 150ルーメン 電池式 BHL-L06SDB 87669
  1. 店を
  2. スポーツ・アウトドア
  3. アウトドア
  4. ライト・ランタン
  5. ヘッドライト
  6. ベルーフ (Beruf) ライト LEDモーションセンサーヘッドライト 150ルーメン 電池式 BHL-L06SDB 87669

ベルーフ (Beruf) ライト LEDモーションセンサーヘッドライト 150ルーメン 電池式 BHL-L06SDB 87669


防水性能 IPX3


他モールでも併売しているため タイミングによって在庫切れの可能性がございます その際は 別途ご連絡させていただきます


明るさ 強/約150ルーメン 弱/約80ルーメン

ベルーフ Beruf ライト LEDモーションセンサーヘッドライト 150ルーメン 電池式 BHL-L06SDB 87669

照射特性 スポット ワイド


付属品 ポリシリコンバンド 1 単三形乾電池 3

光源 Cree XPE 1個

別売バッテリー 87691充電バッテリー使用可能

他モールでも併売しているため タイミングによって在庫切れの可能性がございます その際は 別途ご連絡させていただきます

点灯時間 強/約4.5時間 弱/約9時間



モーションセンサー搭載で手をかざすだけで点灯消灯できる フォーカスダイヤルで照射エリアを切替可能 点灯モード切替機能付で用途に応じて切替できる

使用環境温度 -5 40度

使用電源 単三形アルカリ乾電池 3本

ベルーフ Beruf ライト LEDモーションセンサーヘッドライト 150ルーメン 電池式 BHL-L06SDB 87669

☎ 0766-21-4700


  • イルギオットーネ 国産牛ラザニア4個入り 京都 八坂 パスタ 4人前 イタリアン お取り寄せ グルメ クール代込 産直 産地直送 kyotopi 産直 ブランドスワンミミ Swanmimiモデルプリント レインコート素材 生地Swanmimiプリントレインコートスタープリント 反射ディテール 取り外し可能なフード レギュラーカラー フロントにボタンクロージャー ロングスリーブ 素材ポリエスエル 100 PVC 100 サイズ表 - キッズウェア2歳86-92cm相当3歳94-98cm相当4歳102-106cm相当5歳108-112cm相当6歳114-118cm相当7歳120-124cm相当8歳126-130cm相当9歳130-134cm相当10歳 Sサイズ 138-140cm相当11歳144-146cm相当12歳 Mサイズ 150-152cm相当13歳152-156cm相当14歳 Lサイズ 158-162cm相当15歳164-168cm相当16歳170-174cm相当商品に関するお問い合わせ 商品の詳細やその他のご質問 は ページ左下の ショップへ相談 よりお問い合わせください 商品番号 6118652006515461をご記入ください 商品の返品 交換 配送に関するお問い合わせは TEL 050-3573-7753Ripostiglio ロジスティックサポートまでお問い合わせください 商品に関するお問い合わせとは窓口が完全に異なります ご確認のうえご連絡をお願いいたします ブランド スワンミミ Swanmimi キーワード レインウェア 商品名 プリント レインコート 出品日時 2021-07-08 09 54 50 カテゴリ キッズ 3-8歳 トップス ライト・ランタン 150ルーメン 電池式 スポーツ・アウトドア Beruf BHL-L06SDB
  • 10個セット 福地製薬 パープルクリア スプレー 30mL 4987469542684-10 商品情報 210815 商品コードhn16920 アイテムハンドツール ブランド カナ タジマ 型番FV-AA18SEBWL JAN4975364265432 サイズ 保証期間初期不良 到着から1週間 のみ 付属品 外箱 説明書 風雅ベスト本体 インナーパッド ファンユニット2個 コントローラー バッテリー ACアダプタ 商品状態 全体 ココロードランク S 未着用品 未使用品 こちらの商品は未使用品です 実際に取り付けての確認は行っておりません 未使用品ですが 保管状態などにより多少の汚れやイタミ スレなどがある場合がございます あらかじめご了承ください 商品説明 こちらの商品はTAJIMA タジマ TJMデザイン 清涼ファン風雅ベスト フルセット Lサイズ FV-AA18SEBWLです ヘッドライト ベルーフ スポーツ・アウトドア BHL-L06SDB ライト・ランタン ライト アウトドア
  • お取り寄せ スペクトラムブランズジャパン/ファーミネーター 大型猫 L 短毛種用 ブランドヘルノ キッズ Herno KidsモデルGiubbini フーデッド ダウンコート素材 生地新シーズンHernoKidsGiubbiniフーデッドダウンコートゴールドトーンのロゴプレート フード フロントにジップクロージャー ロングスリーブ サイドにジップポケットx2 ミドル丈 素材ライニング ポリアミド 100 ダウンフェザー 100 アウター ポリアミド 100 サイズ表 - キッズウェア2歳86-92cm相当3歳94-98cm相当4歳102-106cm相当5歳108-112cm相当6歳114-118cm相当7歳120-124cm相当8歳126-130cm相当9歳130-134cm相当10歳 Sサイズ 138-140cm相当11歳144-146cm相当12歳 Mサイズ 150-152cm相当13歳152-156cm相当14歳 Lサイズ 158-162cm相当15歳164-168cm相当16歳170-174cm相当商品に関するお問い合わせ 商品の詳細やその他のご質問 は ページ左下の ショップへ相談 よりお問い合わせください 商品番号 6118652041231071をご記入ください 商品の返品 交換 配送に関するお問い合わせは TEL 050-3573-7753Ripostiglio ロジスティックサポートまでお問い合わせください 商品に関するお問い合わせとは窓口が完全に異なります ご確認のうえご連絡をお願いいたします ブランド ヘルノ キッズ Herno Kids キーワード レインウェア 商品名 Giubbini フーデッド ダウンコート 出品日時 2021-07-08 09 54 50 カテゴリ キッズ 3-8歳 トップス BHL-L06SDB 87669 アウトドア スポーツ・アウトドア
  • 真空ポンプ ドライ式 ULVAC 単相100V ダイアフラム型ドライ真空ポンプ 排気速度60/72 DA-60S 販売単位 1 送料無料 ブランドオーワユリカ Owa YurikaモデルYamato レイヤードコート素材 生地OwaYurikaYamatoレイヤードコートフード ロングスリーブ ゴムウエスト ジップクロージャー サイドにパッチポケットx2 フルライニング 素材アウター ポリエスエル 100 サイズ表 - キッズウェア2歳86-92cm相当3歳94-98cm相当4歳102-106cm相当5歳108-112cm相当6歳114-118cm相当7歳120-124cm相当8歳126-130cm相当9歳130-134cm相当10歳 Sサイズ 138-140cm相当11歳144-146cm相当12歳 Mサイズ 150-152cm相当13歳152-156cm相当14歳 Lサイズ 158-162cm相当15歳164-168cm相当16歳170-174cm相当商品に関するお問い合わせ 商品の詳細やその他のご質問 は ページ左下の ショップへ相談 よりお問い合わせください 商品番号 6118652066430851をご記入ください 商品の返品 交換 配送に関するお問い合わせは TEL 050-3573-7753Ripostiglio ロジスティックサポートまでお問い合わせください 商品に関するお問い合わせとは窓口が完全に異なります ご確認のうえご連絡をお願いいたします ブランド オーワユリカ Owa Yurika キーワード レインウェア 商品名 Yamato レイヤードコート 出品日時 2021-07-08 09 54 50 カテゴリ キッズ 3-8歳 トップス ライト ベルーフ アウトドア LEDモーションセンサーヘッドライト BHL-L06SDB 150ルーメン スポーツ・アウトドア
  • バイク用品 外装 タンデム関連ウイルズウィン WirusWin COOCASE製BOX付ダブルRキャリア C125 2BJ-JA482113-17-03 4550255317058取寄品 商品情報 210814 商品コードhn16919 アイテムハンドツール ブランド カナ タジマ 型番FV-AA18SEBWL JAN4975364265432 サイズ 保証期間初期不良 到着から1週間 のみ 付属品 外箱 説明書 風雅ベスト本体 インナーパッド ファンユニット2個 コントローラー バッテリー ACアダプタ 商品状態 全体 ココロードランク S 未着用品 未使用品 こちらの商品は未使用品です 実際に取り付けての確認は行っておりません 未使用品ですが 保管状態などにより多少の汚れやイタミ スレなどがある場合がございます あらかじめご了承ください 商品説明 こちらの商品はTAJIMA タジマ TJMデザイン 清涼ファン風雅ベスト フルセット Lサイズ FV-AA18SEBWLです 電池式 Beruf スポーツ・アウトドア ライト 150ルーメン 87669
  • ふるさと納税 焼くだけ簡単 鶏味噌漬け 合計2.7kg 1225448 商品名 サムシング SOMETHING サムシング 自転車 リュック対応 バイザーシステム搭載 軽量 レインコート ウィズレインハイポンチョPlus レディース メイン素材 ポリエステル 素材構成 100 ポリエステル SIZE F ゆき丈 83cm 着丈 114.5cm 商品紹介商品紹介 信頼と安心のTPUラミネート素材 耐水圧5000mm 背中反射材付 手甲カバーはサイクルスタイルに最適 別売りレインバイザー V-001 を取り付ければ 雨によるメイク崩れを防ぎ 視界良好 ブランド説明 サムシング 商品介 得信 的TPU 材料 耐水 5000毫米 背部反光材料 手背套非常适合 行 格 安装另售的防雨面罩 V-001 ,防止因雨水引起的 形, 野良好 品牌 明 武士兵ブランド紹介サムシング 150ルーメン ヘッドライト スポーツ・アウトドア アウトドア BHL-L06SDB 電池式 Beruf ライト・ランタン
  • ドウシシャ 流しそうめん器 大人のながしそうめん 電池式 KWS-18footnotes 読み込みに失敗しました ただいま 一時的に読み込みに時間がかかっています 時間をおいて再度お試しください OK logo caption annotation items label logo caption items logo caption points description points pt points pt 1上限達成済み 2未エントリー 獲得予定ポイントにSPU スーパーポイントアッププログラム や一部キャンペーンを含めて表示しています times すべての配送方法と送料を見る すべての配送方法と送料を見る ログインすると 登録した都道府県の最安送料が表示されます 最安送料での配送をご希望の場合 注文確認画面にて配送方法の変更が必要な場合があります 離島 一部地域は追加送料がかかる場合があります 東京 神奈川 千葉 埼玉で 対象エリア外へのご注文は 毎日 15 00までのご注文で翌日の配達となります あす楽 楽天カード新規入会で当日から使える2,000ポイントゲット 平日14時までの注文であす楽 下記商品リストからご希望の商品をお選びください サイズxa0 xa0カラー xa0 MFXLXXL 827.ドット ネイビー 平日14時までの注文であす楽 平日14時までの注文であす楽 平日14時までの注文であす楽 平日14時までの注文であす楽 828.ドット ブラウン 平日14時までの注文であす楽 平日14時までの注文であす楽 平日14時までの注文であす楽 平日14時までの注文であす楽 売り切れ こちらの商品はメール便配送不可です 通常宅配便を了承します 個数xa0 商品をかごに追加 未選択項目があります 選択肢を選んでから買い物かごに入れてください ご購入手続きへ 未選択項目があります 選択肢を選んでから買い物かごに入れてください この商品は販売期間前です 下の お気に入り商品 をクリックしてお気に入りに登録しましょう 商品についての問合わせ レビューを書く DOGMAN WZ ハイクオリティ ケーブルレスフードベスト 9014 EFウェアの活用シーンを加速的に広げる 快適スペックを搭載した汎用性の高いシリーズ 素材 ポリエステル97 レーヨン3 ハイパワーバッテリー 9927 Divaiz WIND ZONE 約10時間の連続送風可能となる超大容量バッテリー 別売りハイパワーファン接続で1日中 高風量連続稼働可能 PSマークに関する表示 届出事業者名 株式会社アゼスト PSマークの種類 PSE ハイパワーファン 9922 Divaiz WIND ZONE BIGモーターカーボンブラシ搭載 シリーズナンバー1パワーの極高風量モデル 手軽に汚を掃除メンテナンス可能 付属 9907高耐久接続ケーブル 補強材入り xa0 価格19,100円 価格18,500円 価格20,200円 価格2,280円 価格1,450円 価格1,280円 価格14,780円 価格1,780円 価格890円 価格18,270円 価格8,670円 価格2,251円 価格2,290円 価格2,836円 価格5,580円 価格1,380円 価格1,500円 価格2,450円 価格1,680円 価格3,980円 スポーツ・アウトドア BHL-L06SDB ヘッドライト ライト ライト・ランタン 87669 アウトドア
  • リクライニング籐回転椅子 ロータイプ 籐家具 籐製品 籐座椅子 籐座いす 籐座イス リクライニング 天然 籐 ラタン 回転座椅子 ジャガード 腰痛 敬老の日 ギフト 藤椅子 藤座椅子 藤イス 品名 BC85 ダブルキャスター メーカー Brunswick ブランズウィック サイズ 高さ310mm 幅405mm 奥行き250mm 基本素材 ポリエステル カラー ブラック ゴールド ブラック レッド お取り寄せ商品となります メーカー在庫切れ 廃盤等は別途ご連絡を差し上げます アウトドア 電池式 ライト ライト・ランタン ベルーフ スポーツ・アウトドア Beruf
  • コクサイ KOKUSAI KSプラクティスボールC号 軟式練習球 オフィシャルタイプ 3ダース カゴ付 送料無料 クーポン 配布中 メーカー直送 代引き 期日指定 ギフト包装 注文後のキャンセル 返品不可 ご注文後確認時に欠品の場合 納品遅れやキャンセルが発生します Brunswick ボウリング 品名 BC200 トリプルローラー 高さ 505mm 幅 810mm サイドポケットとスタンド含 奥行き 330mm サイドポケット含 基本素材 ポリエステル カラー 黒 金 黒 赤 収納個数 3個 在庫切れの際はメーカー取り寄せを行いますので 発送まで日数を頂くことがあります 予めご了承下さい 格安ボーリング用品販売実施中 このトリプルはボウリングバッグの最上位モデルです 世の中には4個入りも存在していますが 収納力が多い反面 移動が大変で 置き場所に困るというユーザーが多く この3個入りバッグに人気が集中しています ボールはもちろん シューズやユニフォームなど プレイに必要なモノを全て収納できる搬送量と ご婦人でもお気軽に移動できる機動力とのバランスは一度使うと元には戻れません 長期間ご愛用していただきたいが故にデザインはあえてシンプルな意匠にいたしました 使われたことのない方はこの機会に是非 ご検討ください ライト スポーツ・アウトドア 87669 150ルーメン
  • アスパル 包丁殺菌庫 キントール C-10A 送料無料 ブランドスワンミミ Swanmimiモデルプリント レインコート素材 生地Swanmimiプリントレインコートフルーツプリント スタープリント 取り外し可能なフード レギュラーカラー フロントにボタンクロージャー ロングスリーブ 素材ポリエスエル 100 PVC 100 サイズ表 - キッズウェア2歳86-92cm相当3歳94-98cm相当4歳102-106cm相当5歳108-112cm相当6歳114-118cm相当7歳120-124cm相当8歳126-130cm相当9歳130-134cm相当10歳 Sサイズ 138-140cm相当11歳144-146cm相当12歳 Mサイズ 150-152cm相当13歳152-156cm相当14歳 Lサイズ 158-162cm相当15歳164-168cm相当16歳170-174cm相当商品に関するお問い合わせ 商品の詳細やその他のご質問 は ページ左下の ショップへ相談 よりお問い合わせください 商品番号 6118652057994461をご記入ください 商品の返品 交換 配送に関するお問い合わせは TEL 050-3573-7753Ripostiglio ロジスティックサポートまでお問い合わせください 商品に関するお問い合わせとは窓口が完全に異なります ご確認のうえご連絡をお願いいたします ブランド スワンミミ Swanmimi キーワード レインウェア 商品名 プリント レインコート 出品日時 2021-07-08 09 54 50 カテゴリ キッズ 3-8歳 トップス ライト・ランタン 150ルーメン LEDモーションセンサーヘッドライト 87669 ヘッドライト Beruf アウトドア
  • 送料込 まとめ買い 7個セット ピップ エレキバン 80 48粒入 VISEのアメリカ仕様は ちょっと違う バイス ボール トート ローラー − ローラー付きトリプルトートバッグ カラー オレンジ イエロー ブラック ネオングリーン グレー ブルー ピンク レッド パープル ホワイト/レッド ブルー/イエロー グレープ/グリーン 素材 デニールナイロン 機能 脱着可能大型シューズバッグ ショルダーベルト ボール収納部クリアトップ スケルトン 側面アクセサリーポケット ボールクリアトップトートプラスと同様 デニールを使用したヘビーデューティー仕様の縫製と 品質の高いジッパーを使用しました トーナメントでのレーン移動などでもこのコンパクトさが活躍すると思います 付属のシューズバッグも同様の仕様でヘビーデューティーになっています シューズバッグとボールバッグはフックで接続します 電池式 アウトドア 150ルーメン LEDモーションセンサーヘッドライト ヘッドライト スポーツ・アウトドア
  • ベルーフ Beruf ライト LEDモーションセンサーヘッドライト 150ルーメン 電池式 BHL-L06SDB 87669

    ベルーフ Beruf ライト LEDモーションセンサーヘッドライト 150ルーメン 電池式 BHL-L06SDB 87669


    ベルーフ Beruf ライト LEDモーションセンサーヘッドライト 150ルーメン 電池式 BHL-L06SDB 87669


    Service Ideas ECAJL22S Eco-Air Lever Lid Airpot, Glass Vacuum, 2.2 Liter 74.4 oz. , Jewel Mirrored Exterior
    2021-08-03 アメリカ連邦税法 所得概念から法人 パートナーシップ 信託まで 伊藤公哉 3000円以上送料無料
    この度、岩瀬にある「お料理ふじ居」がミシュランで2つ星を獲得しました。当社で1日1組限定の完全貸切宿としてお取扱いしている、「売薬宿屋 山キ」の1泊2食付きプランで仕出し料理として依頼しているのが、今回ミシュランで2つ星を獲得した「お料理ふじ居」です!
    これを機に、1日1組のプライベートな時間を過ごせる「売薬宿屋 山キ」でゆったりとした時間を過ごし、ミシュランで2つ星を獲得した 料理に舌鼓をうってみませんか?
    ※1日1組限定の完全貸切宿「売薬宿屋 山キ」のプランの詳細は、こちらからどうぞ
    ご予約可能期間 5/10(月)~6/30(水)まで

    ゴルフレッスンD D 井戸木鴻樹プロ 第1弾 第2弾 2枚組セット



    TEL 0766-21-4700
    FAX 0766-21-4668
    営業時間 9:00~16:00
    定休日 土曜日・日曜日・祝日

    Copyright © 2018 富山県福祉旅行センター All Rights Reserved.

    ベルーフ Beruf ライト LEDモーションセンサーヘッドライト 150ルーメン 電池式 BHL-L06SDB 87669 ベルーフ Beruf ライト LEDモーションセンサーヘッドライト 150ルーメン 電池式 BHL-L06SDB 87669

    PE Explorer 1.99 R5 Download

    PE Explorer 1.99 R5 Description:

    PE Explorer is the most feature-packed tool for inspecting the inner workings of PE files (EXE, DLL, ActiveX controls, and several other Windows executable formats).

    PE Explorer offers a thorough look at PE file structure and all of the resources in the file, and tells you just about every little detail you could possibly want to know about a PE file.

    PE Explorer comes with a Visual Resource Editor, PE Header Viewer, UPX Unpacker, Exported/Imported API Function Viewer, API Function Syntax Lookup, Dependency Scanner, and powerful Disassembler.PE Explorer is a DLL viewer, resource editor, win32 PE disassembler, and dependency scanner.

    The product allows you to peek inside Delphi applications and edit the properties of controls on Delphi forms within the PE file. Once inside, file structure can be analyzed and optimized, problems diagnosed, changes made and resources repaired.

    Whether you are an advanced computer user just wondered what makes an executable file tick, or software developer suffered from hard-to-find program bugs, PE Explorer is the software solution that will make it easy to find the answers.

    With PE Explorer you can view, edit and repair the internal structures of PE files with the click of a button. It works with PE formats such as EXE, DLL, MSSTYLES, SYS, OCX, SCR and other win32 executables.

    Support for custom plug-ins. Use it for serious development projects, for restoring lost information, for keeping damaged files intact, for determination of the existence of viruses or malicious code in the programs, to reverse engineer projects with missing source code, to view the imports/exports of the standard dll's, or to simply reduce the numerous internal information sources of PE files into a more convenient viewing format and save your valuable time. The possibilities are up to you. PE Explorer gives you an easy to use point and click approach from which to operate.

    PE Explorer 1.99 R5 Features:

    · Working with PE files such as exe, dll, sys, msstyles, bpl, dpl, cpl, ocx, acm, ax, scr and other win32 executables.
    · The ability to open a broken or packed file in Safe mode.
    · Verifying a PE file's integrity.
    · Automatically unpacks files packed with UPX. Support for custom plug-ins to perform any startup processing.
    · Saving changes to disk as a new image file.
    · Customizing the general, view and logging settings. You can set the default Viewer at startup using View>Customize>General Tab.
    · Header Info Viewer displays the header information contained in the PE file header.
    · Checksum computing and modification.
    · Entry Point value modification.
    · Data Directories Viewer to view and edit Data Directories.
    · Sections Header Viewer to view, extract, recalculate or delete sections from the program body.
    · Section Editor repairs and restores the damaged section headers settings.
    · Export, Import and Delay Import Function List Viewers.
    · Quick Function Syntax Lookup displays the calling syntax for the found functions.
    · Syntax Description Editor for adding custom comments, altering values or creating new library descriptions.
    · Unmangling the exported symbols back to human-readable names.
    · Debug Info Viewer to view the debug information contained in the file.
    · Relocation Viewer to view contents of the base relocation table.
    · Resource Editor to view, delete, extract or modify nearly every type of resources.
    · XP Visual Style Manifest Wizard inserts Windows XP user interface manifests in existing applications - an easy way for legacy applications take advantage of the new look for common control styles on Windows XP.
    · Disassembler reconstructs the assembly language source code of target files.
    · Dependency Scanner helps you learn the minimum set of DLL files required for the EXE file to load and run.
    · TimeDateStamp Adjuster modifies all the TimeDate Stamps to one uniform value.
    · Remove Debug Info Tool strips the various types of debug information stored in the file.
    · Remove Relocations Tool strips the table of base relocations from the EXE files and saves space.

    PE Explorer 1.99 R5 Requirements:

    · Intel Pentium® or AMD K5 processor with 166 MHz
    · 15 MB free hard disk space
    · 16 MB RAM

    PE Explorer 1.99 R5 Limitations:

    · 30 day trial
    · Nag Screen

    Related searches:

    dll export viewer - pic disassembler - dependency visualizer

    PE Explorer security information

    You cannot download any crack or serial number for PE Explorer on this page. Every software that you are able to download on our site is legal. There is no crack, serial number, hack or activation key for PE Explorer present here. Our collection also doesn't contain any keygens, because keygen programs are being used in illegal ways which we do not support. All software that you can find here is freely downloadable and legal.

    PE Explorer installation package is prepared to be downloaded from our fast download servers. It is checked for possible viruses and is proven to be 100% clean and safe. Various leading antiviruses have been used to test PE Explorer, if it contains any viruses. No infections have been found and downloading PE Explorer is completelly problem free because of that reason. Our experts on malware detection tested PE Explorer with various spyware and malware detection programs, including custom malware and spyware detection, and absolutelly no malware or spyware was found in PE Explorer.

    All software that you can find on our servers, including PE Explorer, is either freeware, shareware or open-source, some of the software packages are demo, trial or patch versions and if possible (public domain licence), we also host official full versions of software.

    Because we want to be one of the fastest download sites on the web, we host all the software including PE Explorer on our servers. You cannot find here any torrents or download links that would lead you to dangerous sites. does support free software, however we do not support warez or illegal downloads. Warez is harming producers of the software.


    Mirror  (9.8 MB)

    About Author

    PE Explorer Activation key


    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *