Air explorer pro Registration Code

Air explorer pro Registration Code

Air Explorer Pro 4.2 Latest Crack. Drag 'n Drop or duplicate/glue the records between your PC and mists or between various mists. Air Explorer Pro 4.2.1 Crack is a program that consolidates all of your cloud storage services into a single location. Air explorer pro free download with crack is the best cloud servers: OneDrive, Google Drive, 4shared, Box, Dropbox, Mega, Copy, Mediafire, Yandex.

Related Videos

Air Explorer Pro 4.2.1 Crack + Activation Key Free Download 2020

Air Explorer Pro 4.2.1 Crack is a helpful device that will speak to clients of cloud administrations. Presently you can without much of a stretch view what documents you store on different servers, just as the capacity to move between them. There are such a large number of individuals on the Internet who store their important information on secret key ensured cloud servers. At times you have to duplicate or move records starting with one assistance then onto the next before you needed to duplicate them first to your PC, and afterwards move them to another help. This program Air Explorer Pro will spare you time. After the dispatch, you will locate a simple and helpful UI with Russian help. You have to pick which administrations you work with, indicate your login information, and afterwards you can perceive what you have put away there.


You May Also LikeWebStorm 2021.2 Activation Code Free Here [2021]

Air Explorer Pro 4.2.1 Crack Free Download underpins the best cloud servers: OneDrive, google power, 4shared, field, Dropbox, uber, multiplication, MediaFire, Yandex, Baidu y WebDAV. There are many people who need to back up their most significant records on cloud servers, secured by a custom username and password.however, while you have to move or imitation a document from one record to the next, you need to first login to the essential record, download the document for your pc, at that point login to the second and include it.

Air Explorer Pro 4.2.1 Crack

Air Explorer Pro 4.2.1 Crack you can improve this crucial the utilization of air adventurer, an application that licenses you to peruse by means of the records you save money on a few cloud servers easily. Air Explorer underpins the best cloud servers: OneDrive, Google Drive, 4shared, Box, Dropbox, Mega, Copy, Mediafire, Yandex, Baidu y WebDAV. There are many individuals who like to reinforcement their most important records on cloud servers, ensured by a custom username and password. However, when you need to move or duplicate a document from one record to the next, you have to first login to the primary record, download the record to your PC, at that point login to the subsequent one and transfer it. You can disentangle this assignment by utilizing Air Explorer, an application that permits you to peruse through the information you store on a few cloud servers easily.

You May Also LikeLoaris Trojan Remover 3.1.74 Crack + Activation Number Free [2021]

Air Explorer Pro Portable Browse information put away on Dropbox, Mega, OneDrive, Google Drive and others. So as to appreciate the elements of Air Explorer, you first need to interface the servers you normally use to the application. All the more unequivocally, you can indicate the username and secret word for one or a few records, at that point download or transfer documents with no problem.


Top Known Features of Air Explorer Pro 4.2.1 Crack :

  • Deal with your records in the cloud legitimately.
  • Alternatively, as they are transferred to the cloud, Air Explorer can encode documents.
  • Set up from a similar server for numerous records.
  • You can synchronize organizers between any PC or cloud.
  • Add all mists to expand capacity.
  • Duplicate/glue between servers in the cloud.
  • Proceed to transfer and download.
  • You can impart records to Air Explorer.
  • Halfway quest all mists for records.
  • Simple to utilize an adventurer for cloud records.
  • Applications for Windows.
  • Perspective on the picture in the thumbnail.
  • Intuitive records between the cloud and the PC.
  • Including a cloud server module framework.
  • Autonomous module for advancement.

Framework Requirements for Air Explorer Pro 4.2.1 Crack :

  • Upheld Operating System: Windows XP/Vista/7/8/8.1/10
  • Memory (RAM) required: 512 MB of RAM required (1 GB RAM Recommended).
  • Hard Disk Space required: 100 MB of free hard plate space required.
  • Processor: Intel Pentium 4 or later.
  • Director rights

What’s going on in Air Explorer Pro 4.2.1 Crack?

  • Extra difference administration.
  • Different records foundation support for OneDrive.
  • Another Air explorer pro Registration Code organizer administration for OneDrive.
  • Other transfer archives to shared OneDrive envelopes.
  • Improved OneDrive speed.
  • OneDrive moved to another API.
  • View imparted to me pushes in OneDrive for Business.
  • Memory advancements for OneDrive for the organization.
  • Extra new section menu to begin a Box record utilizing the Internet Browser.
  • A presentation record hashes an incentive in the archive properties windows the first tab.
  • Today after each synchronization, an HTML report including details and errors.
  • Air Explorer Pro Activation Code 2020

How to Activate Air Explorer Pro?

  • Most importantly, Install Air Explorer
  • Once Install Do not Launch/Run Program
  • From that point onward, Copy articles from the split organizer
  • At that point Paste and supplant into arrangement index
  • Dispatch Air Explorer
  • That is All, Enjoy Air Explorer Pro.

Air Explorer Pro Activation Key


Air Explorer Pro Keygen Key


10 Best Health ( Disclaimer 

First of all thank you very much for visiting the website. We are not responsible for Air Explorer Pro Crack will work or not on your system. You have to complete the instructions that are provide das above to properly work on your system. As per directions, you have to disable the antivirus and then the internet for proper installation. On Windows, you must disable the Windows defender. I hope it will work without any issue and you appreciate our efforts. Moreover, if you have any issue you may comment. If you have no issue then it’s your responsibility to share on your social account for your friends and community.

Like this:




Air Explorer Pro Crack


Air Explorer Pro Crack supports the best cloud servers: OneDrive, Google Drive, 4shared, Box, Dropbox, Mega, Copy, Mediafire, Yandex, Baidu y WebDAV. There are a lot of people who like to backup their most valuable documents on cloud servers, protected by a custom username and password. However, when you want to move or copy a file from one account to the other, you need to first login to the first account, download the file to your PC, then login to the second one and upload it. You can simplify this task by using Air Explorer Crack, an app that allows you to browse through the data you store on several cloud servers with ease.

Air Explorer Pro Key Features:

DownloadCelemony Melodyne 5 Crack With Keygen Free Download 2021

Straightforward looks and neatly organized tabs:

  • Air Explorer Key comes with a user-friendly GUI (graphical user interface) that makes it easy even for beginners to enter their credentials and connect their online account to this app.
  • In addition to exploring the files you store on your cloud servers, you can also search for a certain file throughout all your connected accounts within a dedicated tab, while another one allows you to synchronize two accounts.

Browse data stored on Dropbox, Mega, OneDrive, Google Drive and others:

  • In order to enjoy the functions of Air Explorer Pro, you first need to connect the servers you regularly use to the app. More precisely, you can specify the username and password for one or several accounts, then download or upload files without any hassle.
  • Air Explorer Full Version supports a wide range of services, such as Dropbox, Box, Google Drive, OneDrive, Mega, Mediafire, WebDav and Yandex, and the login process is as straightforward as possible: enter the username and password, and you are done.

DownloadAvast Cleanup Premium 20.1.9801 Crack + License Key Download {2021}

Move files between accounts or encrypt all uploads:

  • Due to Air Explorer, you can easily copy or move documents from one account to one, with only a few mouse clicks – you can browse data in a two-panel mode, so you can easily select one or more files that you want to transfer.
  • Moroever, Air Explorer Pro Patch can also help you protect the security of your data by encrypting all the files you upload to the cloud – it goes without saying that you need to remember the password you use, otherwise you will not be able to access the files afterwards.
  • All in all, the application is a nifty app that can help you save a lot of time when it comes to browsing files you store in cloud accounts, as well as transfer them or sync local folders to online ones.

Air Explorer Pro Serial Download


How to Crack or Activate Air Explorer Pro Cracked??

  • First Download from the given link or button.
  • Uninstall the Previous version with IObit Uninstaller Pro.
  • Turn off the Virus Guard.
  • Then extract the rar file and open the folder (Use Winrar or Winzip to extract).
  • Run the setup and close it from everywhere.
  • Open the “Crack” or “Patch” folder, copy and paste into installation folder and run.
  • Or use the key to activate the Program.
  • All done enjoy the Air Explorer Pro Latest Version 2021.

Mirror Here


The effects of ideological value framing and symbolic racism on pro-environmental behavior


Environmental degradation continues to be one of the greatest threats to human well-being, posing a disproportionate burden on communities of color. Environmental action, however, fails to reflect this urgency, leaving social-behavioral research at the frontier of environmental conservation, as well as environmental justice. Broad societal consensus for environmental action is particularly sparse among conservatives. The lack of even small personal sacrifices in favor of the environment could be attributed to the relatively low salience AVG TuneUp Crack 21.1 Build 2404 + License Key Free Download 2021 environmental threats to white Americans and the partisan nature of environmentalism in America. We evaluate if (1) environmental action is causally related to the ideological value framing of an environmental issue; and (2) if the perceived race of impacted communities influences environmental action as a function of racial resentment. With this large-scale, original survey experiment examining the case of air-pollution, we find weak support for the first, but we do not find evidence for the second. We advance our understanding of environmental justice advocacy and environmental inaction in the United States.

Protocol registration

The stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on 10 June 2021. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at


The simultaneous urgency and scarcity of environmental action, and the social inequalities that result, highlights the question of how to elicit environmental action. While environmental concern has been linked to the intent to act environmentally and a reported willingness to make economic sacrifices for the environment1, it does not fully explain patterns of environmental behavior2. There is a necessary change in focus away from mere concern towards the environment, and how ideology might shape this relationship3. Though numerous models have attempted to explain the determinants of environmental behavior, the attitude-action gap remains: concern in itself is not sufficient to reliably predict environmental action4. As such, social-behavioral research has presented itself as a promising avenue for discovering constructive approaches to achieving environmental action, as well as environmental justice by reducing inequalities in the impact of environmental degradation.

A promising area of exploration for a wider uptake of environmental action, which has widely been labeled as a liberal issue, is the use of value framing or “moral reframing” to broaden the appeal of environmental action to conservative audiences5. Currently, Air explorer pro Registration Code messages not only do not appeal to conservatives, but have been shown to actively repel them from environmental decisions, such as supporting energy efficiency6. Political ideology in itself has been conceptualized as a means of deriving social ontologies, where more ideologically inclined people have consistent views even on issues that do not directly relate to the substance of their ideology7. Among conservatives, a skeptical or adversarial stance towards environmentalism could be an example of ontologies at play. Reframing environmental messaging in terms of conservative values has been shown to shrink the difference in environmental attitudes between liberals and conservatives, and therefore shows promise as a method to also increase environmental action8.

This paper is situated in the persistent and disturbing trend that the social impacts of environmental degradation disproportionately burden marginalized communities, particularly communities of color, globally and in the United States. The phenomenon has been labeled as environmental injustice or environmental racism, which manifests itself as increased exposure and increased vulnerability to air, water, and soil pollution, which environmentally privileged communities are largely exempt from9, 10. Environmental injustice and environmental privilege are two sides of the same coin: access to a clean and safe environment is available only to some, usually white, Americans10, 11. Understanding environmental injustice as such raises the question as to whether environmental concern or environmental action can therefore be predicted by racial resentment. Building on Park and Pellow’s framework of environmental privilege, the willingness to take environmental action, or to make a small personal sacrifice for the benefit of the environment and the people effected by it, can be understood as a willingness to pay for a different community’s access to a healthy and safe environment. Therefore, and in accordance with a small body of literature, we anticipate that racial resentment will stifle environmental action12, 13, as relatively environmentally privileged white Americans would be less inclined to support a predominantly Black community’s environmental well being10.

As of yet, the majority of research related to environmental justice has focused on health and economic challenges as outcomes of racist and unequal systems14, however a small set of studies have also examined racism as a potential suppressor of environmental concern12, 15, 16. Benegal found that racial resentment correlated with reduced concern over climate change, particularly after Obama was elected president, indicating a “spillover of racialization” suggesting racial resentment as a cause of environmental indifference. Chanin found that racial resentment or symbolic racism predicted lower indices of self reported environmental concern based on data from the General Social Survey16, and Dietz and colleagues found that racial resentment also predicted lower donation rates to a water quality organization following the severe water contamination in Flint, Michigan12. This paper seeks to further explore the link between racial resentment and environmental indifference, while also utilizing value framing to appeal to audiences across the political spectrum5, 8, 17.

To test how value framing, and symbolic racism activated by the perceived race of communities impacted by environmental threats influence environmental action, we designed and fielded an experiment to liberals and conservatives where we manipulate independently the value of environmental protection by invoking conservative or liberal ideology, and the racial composition of the communities being impacted by environmental issues using a personalized story. We focus on a specific form of environmental action: donation to an environmental organization, which can be made at the expense of giving up raffle tickets that respondents could use toward a gift card.

For ease of presentation, we refer to “value aligned” treatments when the intended ideological frame of the treatment aligns with respondents’ ideology, and “value misaligned” treatments, when the opposite is the case. For example, the conservative value framed treatment would be value aligned when assigned to a conservative respondent, and value misaligned when assigned to a liberal respondent. The racial composition of communities impacted was signaled by the names of individuals in a story who have suffered adverse health consequences by air pollution, also referred to as race manipulation through the paper.

We hypothesize that:


Respondents presented with a value-aligned treatment will donate at higher rates than those presented with a value-misaligned treatment.

We predict that donation rates will vary as a function of value alignment even when controlling for the race manipulation, a measure of environmental concern and symbolic racism in addition to respondent-level controls for gender, age, race, education, income, and ideology. For more detail on these measures, see the “Methods” section.

We also hypothesize that:


Respondents with high levels of symbolic racism primed with a story about a Black family will donate less.

We predict that donation rates will vary as a function of the interaction between the race manipulation and the symbolic racism score of respondents when controlling for value-alignment, the race manipulation, environmental concern, symbolic racism in addition to respondent-level controls for gender, age, race, education, income, and ideology.

Experimental design and procedures

Prior to designing and conducting the survey experiment Air explorer pro Registration Code below, we conducted a pilot study that guided the design of our experimental treatments and influenced our proposed analyses. For a detailed description of this pre-test see the relevant section of the Supplementary Information (SI), the main conclusions we derived from it are summarized in the “Methods” section.

Our study proceeds in two steps, i.e., in two separate data collections (for a flow chart, see Fig. S2). In the first data collection, each respondent receives a set of questions that aim to measure symbolic racism and environmental concern, which we treat as baseline measures. At this instance respondents also answer questions about their demographic background and ideology. About three weeks later, in a separate survey, respondents are given the chance participate in a follow-up questionnaire where they are presented with only one of four possible treatments which we randomly assign with equal probability, and are then given the opportunity to donate tokens towards an environmental organization, Earthjustice, or keep the tokens as raffle push video wallpaper 4.46 license key - Activators Patch for a gift card (referred to as: second data collection). This experimental design places respondents in a real-stakes decision-making scenario where they ought to give up a small personal benefit (maximizing their chances of winning the raffle) in order to give resources to an environmental organization.

Each treatment consists of a factual paragraph about air pollution, a short narrative about a family impacted by it, and a paragraph framed to appeal to liberal or conservative values (the full instruments for both data collections are included in the SI). The value frames were designed based on previous research that aimed to prime political ideology17. The stories about families only differ in the names of the family members, which were chosen from lists of names typically perceived as Black or as white while keeping social class constant18. The primary outcome of the study is respondents’ decision of how many tokens to donate of the 10 they are each awarded, which we operationalize as a continuous outcome (but we also discuss an alternative operationalization as a robustness check). Other key quantities include respondents’ environmental concern which is operationalized as a scale based on16, and a measure of symbolic racism, also operationalized as a scale based on12, 16, 19. We measure respondents’ political ideology on the basis of respondents’ self reports and the classification used by TurkPrime that provides services to researchers fielding their survey to Amazon Mechanical Turk Workers, but we also discuss alternative operationalizations as robustness checks.

Respondents were recruited via Amazon Mechanical Turk, using the services of TurkPrime (additional details for “Inclusion criteria and data quality” are discussed in the “Methods” section). In total 1582 respondents took part in the first data collection and received $0.50 as a show up fee where we collect information on the variables that form the basis of the symbolic racism measure, and the measure of environmental concern. In the second data collection, about three weeks after the first, 1153 respondents (72.9% of the initial sample) returned, and received $1.00 for completing the survey paid as a show-up fee. In addition, those who answered the comprehension check questions about the text on air-pollution correctly on their first attempt received a bonus of $0.50, which 94.6% of respondents earned. In the second data collection two randomly selected respondents also received a $100 Amazon gift card, to incentivize respondents from the first data collection to participate. Chances to be selected were proportional to the number of tokens that respondents kept, and did not donate to the environmental organization. Respondents know that the tokens that they do not keep will be converted into real-world money and donated to an environmental organization: for each token given to the organization, we donated $0.50 on the respondent’s behalf. On average the first survey took respondents 4.62 mins, the second 7.25 mins. Descriptive statistics for the sample can be found in Table S4, and the distribution of the main outcome measure is presented in Fig. S2.

In order to verify that respondents are categorized by TurkPrime as conservative and liberal accurately, respondents are also asked to identify themselves on a scale ranging from “very liberal” to “very conservative.” We restrict the sample to respondents whose self-identification and TurkPrime classification coincide. Only 8.43% of conservatives and 2.62% of liberals identified differently from the categorization applied by TurkPrime. Note, that we do not have any way of knowing which measure is accurate, and that political ideology of respondents might change over time. The reason why we rely in our main analyses on the categories from TurkPrime as well as self-reports, is because we assume that in these cases we would have the most accurate information on respondents who have a stable, well-formed ideology. We also conduct our main analyses restricting our sample to those who answered comprehension check questions correctly on their first attempt (94.6% of the sample). These individuals, we anticipate, pay closer and more careful attention to the treatment, and are more likely to frame their decisions in these terms. Applying these two exclusion criteria, we analyze responses from 1034 individuals (89.7% of the sample collected in the second data collection). Note that the analytical sample has a virtually identical distribution over demographic characteristics and scores of symbolic racism and environmental concern of all respondents in the first data collection, and all respondents in the second data collection (Table S2), therefore we do not anticipate any of our results to be biased by sample selectivity on the basis of these characteristics.


In Table 1 we present the results of two regression models, each serving a purpose to test H1 and H2 (Model 1 and Model 2, respectively). We do not find a statistically significant effect of matching ideological value framing on donations. i.e., we fail to uncover evidence consistent with H1. Substantively, in our experiment respondents do not donate more tokens to Earthjustice when the ideological value framing of the text they read aligns with their ideology. We do not find evidence of a statistically significant interaction effect between respondent’s symbolic racism scores and reading a personalized story of a Black family impacting donations either, i.e., we fail to uncover evidence consistent with H2. Substantively, in our experiment respondents with higher symbolic racism scores do not donate significantly lower amounts when they read about a Black (as compared to a white) family impacted by air-pollution. We conduct four set of robustness analyses.

Full size table

First, while our main analysis excludes respondents who failed to answer the comprehension check questions correctly the first time, we also conduct the main analyses on the full sample. With these analyses we aim to show that any findings we might uncover are robust to noise, which would likely increase with the inclusion of less attentive respondents. If anything, the inclusion of these observations we believed would weaken our findings, but might enhance their external validity as in daily life it is unlikely that all casual readers of news and materials produced by awareness campaigns are read with close attention to detail. These robustness analyses (Table 2) reveal consistent findings with those presented in Table 1 for H2, but we do find evidence consistent with H1 (a marginally significant point estimate of 0.331, \(p < 0.1\) for value aligned treatments, i.e., an increase in donations of 0.3 of a token). A potential reason for this could be that while inattentive readers may have focused less on facts (which the comprehension check questions asked about), they could have ascertained the ideological message (potentially unconsciously). Note however, that the point-estimates between the models estimated on the restrictive and the full sample are not statistically significantly different.

Full size table

Full size table

Second, those whose self-reported ideology did not coincide with the TurkPrime classification are included in this robustness check, and the TurkPrime classification is taken into account. With these analyses we aim to show that any findings we uncover are robust to noise, which would likely increase with the inclusion of all respondents with potentially less solidified ideology and/or less attention to the survey. These analyses are presented in Table 3 and reveal substantively the same result as those obtained in Table 1.

As our pilot data uncovered, the intended race signal of our manipulation has not been uniformly understood by respondents, and interacted with the ideology treatment. We therefore conduct two sets of robustness analyses. It is not possible for us to conclusively decide if respondents are influenced by the amount they donated when answering the follow-up questions about the treatment which includes a question about the perceived race of Air explorer pro Registration Code family in the story, or if respondents’ assessment of the race of the family is casually influenced by the ideology they attribute to the treatment. Therefore, we conduct the main analyses by restricting the sample in two ways. Both of these robustness checks might yield more accurate results (particularly for H2), however, these may not rise to the level of statistical significance due to smaller samples.

First, we restrict the analytical sample to respondents who identified the race manipulation as we intended. We anticipated that these analyses might yield stronger results, but it also reduces our sample size. Indeed, our sample size reduced to only 617 respondents (59.7% of the analytical sample), and the results are presented in Table 4. While we do not observe a statistically significant interaction effect, the size of the effect is considerably larger in absolute value (a point estimate of − 0.234 compared to a point estimate of − 1.324). Second, we repeat the main analyses by treating respondents’ understanding of the race manipulation, i.e., their self-reports of the race of the family, and taking that as the signal. Note that in this particular case only respondents who identified families as non-Hispanic white and families as Black enter our analyses (i.e., 778 individuals, 75.2% of the analytical sample). These models are presented in Table 5, and reveal substantively similar findings to those presented in Table 1. In this case as well while we do not observe a statistically significant interaction effect, the size of the effect is considerably larger in absolute value (a point estimate of − 0.234 compared to a point estimate of − 1.523). We return to this point in the discussion.

Full size table

Full size table

Our last robustness analysis concerns the functional form for modeling donations. We repeat our main analysis using a binary outcome variable (donated or not), and a Tobit specification—both have been used in prior work20, 21 demonstrating that dictator games typically produce skewed distributions, which our design mimics. These alternatives might be more appropriate Air explorer pro Registration Code forms to consider, which is important, as incorrect functional forms may induce biased estimates. We anticipated that the main conclusions from these analyses will broadly align with the main specifications, which is indeed the case as presented in Table 6.

Full size table

Exploratory analysis

In exploratory analyses we aim to document any heterogeneity in the effects in H1 and H2 by political ideology and environmental concern. These analyses are particularly important for developing future work. While the liberal and conservative manipulations are interpreted significantly differently on a 7-point conservative-liberal scale (differences in means 0.380 in the pooled sample, \(p < 0.001\), 0.308 among conservatives, \(p < 0.1\), and 0.455 among liberals, \(p < 0.001\)) our ideology treatments are both considered in mostly liberal terms (consistent with the conclusions derived in the pre-test). Therefore, we anticipated that the conservative treatments might be less effective, and in particular, conservatives may not read the intended value-aligned treatment in conservative terms. We therefore explore treatment effect heterogeneity by political ideology by estimating the same regressions for liberal and conservative respondents separately (as defined for the main analyses). Indeed, we find that value alignment is significantly associated with donations amongst liberals (point estimate of 0.561, \(p < 0.1\)), but not amongst conservatives (point estimate of 0.046, \(p = 0.867\)), see Table S4. This could be a shortcoming of our treatment (e.g., a longer text may have emphasized ideology more), could also be a result of the politicized nature of environmental action in the US8, or may have revealed true heterogeneity of effects. Future work should explore these avenues to enhance the efficacy of environmental communication.

Additionally, we also explore if those with high levels of environmental concern donate different amounts when they read a value aligned treatment. A positive and statistically significant coefficient would mean that value alignment may elicit environmental action amongst those who are already concerned about the environment. Alternatively, a negative and statistically significant coefficient would mean that value alignment may elicit Air explorer pro Registration Code action amongst those who have not been concerned about the environment, and therefore provides us with a powerful tool for intervention to nudge those towards environmental action who are not predisposed to be engaged in it. We, however, do not find a significant interaction between environmental concern and value alignment (Table S5).

Last but not least we also conduct additional analysis in Table S6 with a series of variables focusing on (1) respondents experiences about the text (specifically, if the text made them feel that change was possible, weather or not they found the text as (ideologically) biased, if they found the facts presented to be credible, and the tone of the text ranging from negative to positive); (2) respondents’ views of the family presented (using two operationalizations: if they found the family to be relatable, or if they would invite the family for dinner); (3) if others who hold similar ideological views (in case of liberals, other liberals, in case of conservatives, other conservatives) respondents believe are concerned about the environment and race-based inequality; (4) the environmental impact respondents perceive their families and communities face. The two operationalizations for respondents’ perceptions of the family presented in the story are used in separate regression. We uncover the following associations (evaluated on the pooled sample): respondents who perceive the text to be hopeful about the possibility of change contribute more (point estimate 0.227, \(p < 0.05\)), while those who perceive it to be biased contribute less (point estimate − 0.190, \(p < 0.05\)). We find that respondents who would have invited the family for dinner also contribute more (point estimate 0.125, \(p < 0.1\)). Respondents concern that their communities are impacted by environmental degradation also contribute more (point estimate 0.272, \(p < 0.05\)). Some of these associations appear to be driven by only one group of respondents by political ideology. Note that these additional variables do not weaken the impact of environmental concern of respondents on donations, and also that the effect sizes are significantly smaller than that of environmental concern. These explorations ought to be interpreted with caution. This analysis was not designed to establish causal relationships; nor should null-effects be interpreted as evidence of no association, and no potential causal effect. For example, the measures of respondents’ beliefs over how other ideologically similar people think about the environment is consistently and positively associated with donations in models that use only these additional factors. This variation is likely a result of collinearity issues, and should not be taken as evidence that norms do not matter for environmental action.


Based on a large, original survey experiment conducted amongst US liberals and conservatives we failed to find evidence consistent with our two hypotheses. Specifically, ideological alignment with respondents’ political ideology of a text on air pollution did not enhance environmental action, nor did symbolic racism moderate the effect of reading a personal story about a Black family on environmental action. While the treatments we implemented did not achieve the anticipated effects, these results, coupled with our observations gleaned from robustness and exploratory analyses provide us with invaluable lessons for environmental communication.

Why did we not uncover an impact of ideological value framing on environmental action? One of the most likely explanations may lie in the weakness of the proposed treatments. As we uncovered during the pre-test and confirmed in the main study, the ideological leaning of all our treatments have been perceived mostly in liberal terms. As a consequence, the actual sample size: respondents who were treated as intended, is much smaller compared to the size of our analytical sample. In case of smaller effects, this reduction of sample size may have resulted in our study being under-powered. As we outlined in our conclusions for the pre-test, however, strengthening the ideological value-frame would have required lengthening the text with ideological messaging, which would have compromised the external validity of our approach. Future work might explore the combination of other types of media to convey ideology via photos or a short video, which could accompany real-world environmental messages. These visual approaches could be more effective in enhancing environmental action, however, they are challenging to design in a way that would not introduce unintentional effects. Alternatively, a liberal or conservative leaning news paper or broadcaster could be associated with the text. This would make the intended ideological leaning of the message more explicit, however such an approach would involve deception. The use of actual messages may compromise the level of similarity in coverage of the same, real-world events. Deception could result in raising respondents’ suspicion about the veracity of what they read (and/or might question if the source indeed produced the text) and influence their environmental action as a result (note that respondents who believed the text they read was ideologically biased donated less). Last but not least, it is important to note that we do find statistically significant effects of ideological value framing amongst liberals. The reasons for this could both be the already-mentioned ones; or they could result from heterogeneous effects as mentioned earlier. Which of these might be the explanation should be subject of future work.

Why did we not uncover an interaction effect between respondents’ symbolic racism scores and them reading a story about a Black family suffering from the consequences of air pollution? Our robustness analyses reveal some potential clues. Specifically, we found this effect increases meaningfully in size when we restricted our analyses to respondents who correctly identified the intended race of the family. Why would respondents misidentify the race of the family and why would this interact with the intended ideological frame is unclear. Future work should however, be particularly attentive to this observation as such effects might interfere with the efficacy of ideological value frames. One potential explanation may be that liberal ideology that prioritizes principles of equity and re-distributive justice may automatically be assumed22. If true, this could create feelings of resentment and hostility as political ideology is linked to an increasingly divisive identity arranged along party-lines in the US and beyond23, 24. It is also possible that the narrative of communities of color being disproportionately impacted by environmental risks already primed respondents outside of the context of the survey experiment, and that their donations were based more in their pre-existing notions of environmental risk. Note however, that our measure of symbolic racism is consistently, and negatively associated with environmental action in almost all the models we have estimated. It is therefore possible that priming respondents with a story of the environment, regardless of the race manipulation, may have already elicited lower levels of environmental action as a result of resentment about race.

In closing, we highlight that our design may have unintentionally elicited environmental action mostly as a result of conscious decisions rooted in rational choice. To encourage thoughtful decisions and careful attention to detail, respondents were asked comprehension check questions prior to making their decisions. This is standard practice in experimental behavioral research, and in the paradigm of behavioral economics only decisions should be considered and analyzed where researchers have been able to verify that subjects understood the payoff structure of economic games. However, people may make most of their daily decisions as a result of their habits, including whether or not to recycle, or whether or not to donate a small amount for environmental causes when opportunities arise as part of routine activities. To an extent, our design decision to ask comprehension check questions and restrict the analytical sample to those who have fully understood the text on a first try may have resulted in more calculated (and potentially less externally valid) decisions25. This observation is particularly important for future experimental work and requires further investigation.

Moving the needle on environmental action, which is equally effective on both sides of the ideological divide is essential. The consistent positive association of concern and action might be one way to strengthen peoples’ will to act on behalf of the environment. However, prior work has already shown the limits of such approaches. Our exploratory analyses revealed that there may be several other pathways, such as an emphasis one’s community environmental risk and ensuring unbiased communication about environmental harms. Future work might focus on these correlates to see how they might be manipulated, and their causal effects established on environmental action. Our study highlighted that possibly different Duolingo APK Mod 5.4.4 Free Download For Android [Latest] need to be applied on the two sides of the ideological divide.

We attempted to quantify the effect of value framing on environmental action, by using key words and concepts central in conservative and liberal discourse. What we found however, suggests that effective messaging must do more than adopting already existing strategies. The association of environmentalism with liberal ideologies appears to overwhelm our attempts to create an environmental message that is understood in conservative terms. The challenge ahead may lie not only in our framing of environmental justice, but also in invoking the identities and norms of the target audiences. For respondents to be spurred to action by any messaging, they might need to image others with whom they identify and share values to take action. Coherence between the message and intended ideology is paramount, not only for minimizing perceived bias, but also for reinforcing a social norm of environmentalist thought and action among conservatives and liberals alike, in spite of their ideological divide in contemporary America.



In order to ensure that our treatments provide only the intended priming effects, we collected pre-test data. The pre-test helped us to evaluate (1) how the treatment texts are perceived by liberals and conservatives; (2) weather the race and value framing manipulations interact; and (3) how the environmental organization we selected for the main experiment is perceived, respectively.

From our pre-test data collection which we conducted on the same platform, using the same data quality filters, we drew the following conclusions. First, the choice of the organization appears to work for our purposes: it is an organization whose work was regarded as relevant for environmental action, and most respondents believed it was effective or highly effective; while an overwhelming majority of respondents have not heard of Earthjustice. In sum, we found no evidence in our pre-test that the selection of the organization interacted with the treatments in unanticipated ways, or that respondents had significant doubts about the relevance or effectiveness of the organization which could influence donations in unanticipated ways.

The pre-test also revealed that the treatments’ use of ideological and race signals are not orthogonal, given the politicized nature of race in America. This interaction microsoft windows and office iso download tool 8.02 - Crack Key For U to us to be virtually unavoidable, and motivated us to include measures in the study on how the race manipulation is perceived by respondents. We opted to include these measures in the main study that allow us perform exploratory analyses using the answers to these questions. While it is possible that motivated reasoning after making donations could influence these answers, we perform analyses on a restricted sub-sample namely on those respondents who correctly identified the intended race of the family. These analyses were suggested as a result of our analyses of pre-test data.

As the pre-test uncovered that the ideology prime was weak, we strengthened the treatment by adding an additional sentence to the paragraph priming of ideology compared to what we used in the pre-test. While based on prior work a superior approach would have been to use a longer value-frame, we opted for the current approach to accommodate the race-prime and to give both primes equal weight in the treatment we designed given the research questions for this study. Additionally, a longer value-frame would have compromised the external validity of the treatments that are designed to present respondents with how a typical news story about air pollution or awareness campaign message might read.

Inclusion criteria and data quality

Respondents must be age 18 or over, based in the United States with at least 100 Human Intelligence Tasks (HIT) completed with at least a 95% approval rating as well as agree to the terms outlined in the consent form in order to participate. Respondents were selected from among CloudResearch Approved respondents ( to further enhance data quality, whose ideology was assessed by TurkPrime, and who identified as “very conservative,” “conservative,” “liberal,” or “very liberal.”

In addition to the already outlined restrictions that influence who may see the HIT, we also used multiple screens to avoid the same individual participating in the study more than one time, making sure that all respondents in the study see only one of the experimental conditions. First, we created a survey group within TurkPrime for all HITs associated with this study, including the pre-test. The same MTurk worker cannot Air explorer pro Registration Code multiple surveys in the same TurkPrime survey group. Second, we activated the “ballot box stuffing” option in Qualtrics, to prevent multiple entries from the same IP address. In addition, we sequentially compiled a list of the MTurk IDs of workers who enter the study using an external SQL database and we automatically verify that each new MTurk worker had not already been part of this list. Our sample, therefore, is limited to unique individuals who took part in the study once, which includes the pre-test data, i.e., respondents in the pre-test study were not eligible to participate in the main study so that we assure all respondents have seen the text about air-pollution the first time.

The fielding for the first data collection took place between January 24th and February 4th, 2021, while the second data collection was carried out between March 9h and March 23rd, 2021.

Ethics Information

The consent form provided to respondents gave a brief description of the content of the survey and how the respondent will be compensated. Informed consent was obtained online. The study was approved by the NYU Abu Dhabi Internal Review Board (#HRPP-2020-119), and was deemed minimal risk. Our study does not involve deception or the collection of sensitive information, but we did collect personal identifiers (MTurk IDs). The personal identifiers were used to award respondents bonuses and to match respondents’ answers to each of the two parts of the survey.

All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations, and were executed according to the pre-registration.

Control variables

Our regression models include controls for the following variables: gender, age, race, education, and income. We discuss their operationalization in-turn. We operationalize gender as female or non-female (a category which contains other than the male-female gender binary). Age is binned: 18-25, 26-45, 46-65, 66 and up. Race is measured as white or non-white, where white are all respondents who did not identify with any other racial group and/or Hispanic ethnicity. Education was operationalized as a categorical variable of: high school or less, some college (including those with associate degrees), undergraduate degree, or graduate degree. Income is also binned with the following five categories and one for those who withheld their income: less than $24,999; $25,000-$49,999, $50,000-$74,999, $75,000-$150,000, Air explorer pro Registration Code than $150,000.

Data availability

We deposited the data for the pilot on Open Science Framework (, alongside the data for the main study.

Code availability

We deposited the code for the pre-test on Open Science Framework (, alongside the code for the main analyses.


  1. 1.

    Hedlund, T. The impact of values, environmental concern, and willingness to accept economic sacrifices to protect the environment on tourists’ intentions to buy ecologically sustainable tourism alternatives. Tour. Hosp. Res.11, 278–288 (2011).

    Article Google Scholar

  2. 2.

    Tam, K.-P. & Chan, H.-W. Environmental concern has a weaker association with pro-environmental behavior in some societies than others: A cross-cultural psychology perspective. J. Environ. Psychol.53, 213–223 (2017).

    Article Google Scholar

  3. 3.

    Bohr, J. & Dunlap, R. E. Key topics in environmental sociology, 1990–2014: Results from a computational text analysis. Environ. Soc.4, 1–4 (2018).

    Article Google Scholar

  4. 4.

    Kollmuss, A. & Agyeman, J. Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?. Environ. Educ. Res.8, 239–260 (2002).

    Article Google Scholar

  5. 5.

    Feinberg, M. & Willer, R. Moral reframing: A technique for effective and persuasive communication across political divides. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass13, 1–12 (2019).

    Article Google Scholar

  6. 6.

    Gromet, H. K., Dena, M. & Larrick, R. P. Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices. PNAS23, 9314–9319 (2013).

    ADSArticle Google Scholar

  7. 7.

    Martin, J. L. & Desmond, M. Political position and social knowledge. Sociol. Forum5, 1 (2010).

    Article Google Scholar

  8. 8.

    Feinberg, M. & Willer, R. The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychol. Sci.24, 56–62 (2013).

    Article Google Scholar

  9. 9.

    Mohai, P., Pellow, D. & Roberts, J. T. Environmental justice. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour.34, 405–430 (2009).

    Article Google Scholar

  10. 10.

    Park, L.S.-H. & Pellow, D. N. The Slums of Aspen-Immigrants vs the Environment in America’s Eden (New York University Press, 2011).

    Google Scholar

  11. 11.

    Leahy, I. & Serkez, Y. Since when have trees existed only for rich Americans? New York Times (2021).

  12. 12.

    Thomas Dietz, J. N., Duan, R. & Witsen, A. V. Social support for water quality: The influence of values and symbolic racism. Hum. Ecol. Rev.24, 51–70 (2018).

    Google Scholar

  13. 13.

    Chandler, J., Paolacci, G. & Hauser, D. Data quality issues on MTurk. In Conducting Online Research on Amazon Mechanical Turk and Beyond (eds Litman, L. & Robinson, J.) 95–120 (Sage Academic Publishing, 2020).

    Google Scholar

  14. 14.

    Banzhaf, H. S., Ma, L. & Timmins, C. Environmental justice: Establishing causal relationships. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ.11, 377–398 (2019).

    Article Google Scholar

  15. 15.

    Benegal, S. D. The spillover of race and racial attitudes into public opinion about climate change. Environ. Polit.27, 733–756 (2018).

    Article Google Scholar

  16. 16.

    Chanin, J. The effect of symbolic racism on environmental concern and environmental action. Environ. Soc.4, 457–469 (2018).

    Article Google Scholar

  17. 17.

    Voelkel, J. G. & Willer, R. Resolving the progressive paradox: Conservative value framing of progressive economic policies increases candidate support (2019). Accessed 4 Jan 2021.

  18. 18.

    Gaddis, S. M. How black are lakisha and jamal? Racial perceptions from names used in correspondence audit studies. Sociol. Sci.4, 469–489 (2017).

    Article Google Scholar

  19. 19.

    Henry, P. J. & Sears, D. O. The symbolic racism 2000 scale. Polit. Psychol.23, 253–283 (2002).

    Article Google Scholar

  20. 20.

    Carpenter, J., Connolly, C. & Myers, C. K. Altruistic behavior in a representative dictator experiment. Exp. Econ.11, 282–298 (2008).

    Article Google Scholar

  21. 21.

    Krupka, E. L. & Weber, R. A. Identifying social norms using coordination games: Why does dictator game sharing vary?. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc.11, 495–524 (2013).

    Article Google Scholar

  22. 22.

    Hoschild, A. R. Strangers in their own land (The New Press, 2016).

    Google Scholar

  23. 23.

    Westwood, S. et al. The tie that divides: Cross-national evidence of the primacy of partyism. Eur. J. Polit. Res.57, 333–354 (2018).

    Article Google Scholar

  24. 24.

    Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N. & Westwood, S. J. The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci.22, 129–146 (2019).

    Article Google Scholar

  25. 25.

    Brett, 4K YouTube to MP3 4.1.0 Crack With License Key Free Download. & Miles, A. Who thinks how? Social patterns in reliance on automatic and deliberate cognition. Sociol. Sci.8, 96–118 (2021).

    Article Google Scholar

Download references


Funding is provided by the New York University Abu Dhabi Capstone Funding Committee, by the NYUAD Center for Interacting Urban Networks (CITIES), funded by Tamkeen under the NYUAD Research Institute Award CG001 and by the Swiss Re Institute under the Quantum Cities™ initiative, and by discretionary research funds of Kinga Makovi awarded by New York University Abu Dhabi. The Capstone Funding Committee or CITIES had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The authors thank Maria Abascal, PJ Henry, Thomas Marlow and Robb Willer for their comments on the project.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Kinga Makovi and Hannah Kasak-Gliboff.


  1. Social Science Division, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE

    Kinga Makovi & Hannah Kasak-Gliboff


The study was jointly designed by K.M. and H.K.G. The pilot data were collected by H.K.G. and analyzed by H.K.G. and K.M. The data for the study were collected by H.K.G. and analyzed by H.K.G. and K.M. The manuscript and supplementary information were written by H.K.G. and K.M.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kinga Makovi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing Air explorer pro Registration Code information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Makovi, K., Kasak-Gliboff, H. The effects of ideological value framing and symbolic racism on pro-environmental behavior. Sci Rep11, 22189 (2021).

Download citation

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Air Explorer Pro 2.0.1 Full Crack with Keygen free Download

If you want to copy or copy a file from one account first, you must first access the first account, download the file to your computer, and then access the other and upload it. You can use the “Air Explorer Pro” application, which allows you to easily browse the information stored on multiple cloud servers.

Features :

Simple look and clear layout labels

Air Explorer comes with a user-friendly GUI (graphical user interface) that even allows beginners to enter their credentials and connect their accounts to this app.

In addition to examining the files you have saved on cloud servers, you can search for files that have been identified across your linked accounts, while the other one allows you to sync two accounts.

Browse data stored on Dropbox, Mega, OneDrive, Google Drive

To use Air Explorer Crcak, you must first connect the servers you use regularly to the application. You can then set a username and password for one or more accounts, and then download or download files without any difficulties.

Air Explorer supports a wide range of services, such as Dropbox, Box, Google Drive, OneDrive, Mega, Mediafire, WebDav and Yandex, and the login process is as simple as possible: enter your username and password and you do it.

Copy files between accounts or encrypt all uploads

With Air Explorer, you can easily copy or move documents, just a few mouse clicks, you can access data in two panels, so you can easily select one or more files you want. transfer

Unfortunately, Air Explorer also helps protect your data by encrypting all files uploaded to the cloud – you do not need to remember the password you are using, otherwise you will not be able to access the files later.

Screen Shot :

Air Explorer Pro 2.0.1 Full Crack


At-Home Review: Key by Amazon In-Garage Delivery

With the holidays approaching, there are few things that will rob you of your seasonal cheer faster than discovering the packages delivered to your door have disappeared. In fact, 11 percent of Americans have had at least one package stolen from their home in the past year, according to a September 2021 Consumer Reports nationally representative survey (PDF) of 2,341 adults. And with supply chain issues continuing to impact the availability of some products, getting a replacement for a stolen item just might require a Christmas miracle.

Those Americans who had a package stolen in the past year reported that the most common step Air explorer pro Registration Code took to prevent future theft (at 21 percent) was to install a video doorbell. But while video doorbells are a great way to catch porch pirates in the act, they can’t stop thieves from running off with packages.

To thwart threshold thefts, Amazon, in 2017, created its Key by Amazon service that allowed its couriers to place packages inside your home. The service, only available to Amazon Prime members, grew over time to offer delivery not only inside homes, but in garages, car trunks, and behind motorized gates. But at the start of the pandemic, Amazon indefinitely halted delivery in homes and cars, leaving garage and gate delivery as the only options.

Here’s how it works: The service uses specialized smart devices that connect your garage door or gate’s motor to the internet, with dedicated smartphone apps that also link to your Amazon account. (For garages, it uses the Chamberlain MyQ Smart Garage Control, $30 (shown below). For gates, it uses the Ring Access Controller Pro 2, $300.) When you place an order, you choose an address you’ve specified for Amazon Key deliveries (more on that later) and the delivery worker will open the garage door or gate, place the package inside, and shut it again. You can also pair your Key by Amazon setup with MyQ or Ring security cameras to record Key deliveries. You’ll receive an alert when a delivery is happening so you can watch it live, or you can view a recording of it later.

To find out if Key by Amazon is a viable solution to the porch pirate problem (at least Air explorer pro Registration Code Amazon deliveries, that is), I decided to evaluate the service in my own home. As CR’s smart-home reporter, I’m no stranger to working—and living—with connected devices. My house contains over 60 smart home devices, including a Ring driveway floodlight camera and a Genie AladdinConnect smart garage door opener that I use to remotely control my garage door and make sure it hasn’t been left open.

Since most people don’t have motorized gates (myself included), I focused on the in-garage delivery. While I do have a smart garage-door opener, you don’t need one to use Key. The Chamberlain MyQ Smart Garage Control it uses should work with any garage door motor as long as it was made in 1993 or later and has photo eyes (those little sensors on either side of the door that tell if it’s obstructed). At $30, it’s also affordable—and Amazon also gives you a $30 store credit to use on your first delivery, essentially making the hardware free.

Alternatively, you can use the service with Chamberlain and LiftMaster-branded MyQ smart garage door openers—which have the control built in—if you already own one or are looking to upgrade.

The installation and setup process for the Chamberlain MyQ Smart Garage Control took about 20 minutes and was very straightforward, with the MyQ app walking me through every step in detail. The app quickly found the device via Bluetooth and connected it to my home WiFi. You then mount the included wireless door sensor (it tells whether the door is open or closed) and pair it with the MyQ device.

Next, you have to pair the MyQ device with your garage door opener (the same way you would pair a new garage door remote). Chamberlain warns that this step can take multiple attempts, and sure enough it took four attempts to pair for me, with each attempt lasting a few minutes. It seemed like this was happening because the MyQ device was trying a different wireless signal each time to connect to the garage door opener.

Chamberlain tells you to mount the MyQ device to the wall of your garage. I skipped this step and used double-sided tape instead, since I’m only using the device temporarily (I also saved myself 5 to 10 minutes by not using screws and a drill).

With installation complete, the MyQ app prompted me to set up Key by Amazon by connecting my Amazon account and choosing my address and MyQ-connected garage door for Key Delivery. I was able to do it all in about two minutes flat.

One note here: Once you’ve set up Key, Amazon will automatically try to deliver items into your garage whenever you choose that address at checkout. The same goes for grocery orders from Amazon Fresh and Whole Foods. However, you can still have deliveries left at your front door by choosing Prime Delivery under delivery options during checkout.

At this point, Key is ready to use, but neither Amazon nor Chamberlain tell you that you can do even more by downloading the Key by Amazon app. From this app, I was able to easily connect my Ring account and choose my driveway floodlight camera to pair with my Key system, as well as fine-tune my delivery settings. These settings include the ability to leave delivery instructions and attach a photo of the exterior of your garage.

Out of curiosity, I opened the Ring app to see if these connections bore any changes in that app. The Ring app has a Key Delivery menu option, but clicking on it brought me to a setup screen (as if I hadn’t spent the last 30 minutes setting everything up). From there, I had to go through the same setup steps of choosing an address and MyQ-connected garage door. There were even the same settings to customize as those in the Key by Amazon app, making the whole process feel redundant. The only perk I received for this repeated work was a new Garage page in the Ring app where I could see the door’s open/close status, as well as a Key Delivery page where I could see a history of my in-garage deliveries. Unless you’ve always dreamed of monitoring your garage door and deliveries from the Ring app, I don’t think these bits of extra functionality are worth setting up.

To try out in-garage delivery, I placed four Amazon orders over the course of about three weeks. Each delivery was flawless, with both the Key by Amazon and Ring apps alerting me when the driver was two stops away and when they were making the delivery. The driver would then open my garage door from their smartphone, place the package inside, and promptly close the door and leave. The whole process was simple and speedy, taking place in just a couple of minutes.

When the delivery was complete, both the Key by Amazon and Ring apps alerted me that the delivery was a success. I could then retrieve my package at any time. Best of all, I didn’t have to worry about it sitting out in the open on my front porch.

It can seem a bit concerning to give a giant tech company access to your garage door. After all, most garages have doors into the rest of the house. To be honest, the only reason I wasn’t concerned is because my garage does not have a door into my home. Of course, you could always just put a lock on that door and keep it locked when you’re expecting a delivery. But Amazon has designed the system to make it as safe as possible.

The Key by Amazon app lists a number of Key Safeguards, including that drivers undergo annual background checks and can only access your home once for your specific package. You can also refuse access to your garage ahead of the delivery if you change your mind.

If you’re an Amazon Prime member and frequent Amazon shopper, I think Key by Amazon in-garage delivery and the Chamberlain MyQ Smart Garage Control are a no-brainer. The system is easy to set up, works well, and is essentially free to buy. You don’t have to worry about packages being stolen, nor do you have to get a neighbor or relative to collect packages when you’re out of town.

The MyQ Smart Garage Control also brings its own benefits, including the ability to remotely open and close your door, see its open/close status, and even schedule your door to automatically close for the night if it’s left open.

The obvious drawback of Key by Amazon is that this system only works for Amazon or Whole Foods deliveries. There’s simply no way to give access to USPS, FedEx, or UPS so they can place deliveries from other retailers in your garage. Would it be great if Amazon opened this system up to those delivery companies? Yep. Is that likely to happen? I doubt it.

For other deliveries, you’re just going to have to rely on a video doorbell or package delivery box, at least until a rival retailer or startup creates their own version of in-garage delivery.

Daniel Wroclawski

I'm obsessed with smart home tech and channel my obsession into new stories advanced installer build command line - Crack Key For U Consumer Reports. When I'm not writing about products, I spend time either outside hiking and skiing or up in the air in small airplanes. For my latest obsessions, follow me on Facebook and Twitter (@danwroc).

Air Explorer

Air Explorer Pro

Air Explorer Pro is a very handy and reliable application that allows you to explore the data you store on several cloud servers and transfer data between them.

There are many people who are looking for backups of their valuable documents on cloud servers protected by custom username and password. But when you are asked to move or copy files from one account to another, you are required to sign in to the first account, download the file to PC and then log in to the second account and upload. You can simplify tasks by using this handy application.

Air Explorer Pro 2021 has got a user-friendly interface, making it very simple and easy for beginners to enter their login information and connect their online accounts with this app. To enjoy the functionality of Air Explorer, you are required to connect to servers that you frequently use with the application.

You can also assign a username and password for one or several accounts, then download or upload files with ease. With Air Explorer, you can copy or move documents from one account to an account with just a few simple clicks.

Features of Air Explorer Pro

  • A very handy and reliable application that allows you to explore the data you store on several cloud servers and transfer data between them.
  • Having a user-friendly interface that will help beginners enter their login information and connect their online accounts with this app is very simple and easy.
  • It is also possible to assign a username and password for one or several accounts, then download or upload files with ease.
  • Documents can be copied or moved from one account to the other with just a few simple clicks.
  • Data can be browsed in two-table mode so you can select one or more files that you need to transfer easily.
  • You also download EaseUS Partition Master 15 from iggtech

System requirements of Air Explorer Pro

  • Operating System: Windows XP / Vista / 7/8 / 8.1 / 10
  • Memory (RAM): 1 GB of RAM required.
  • Hard Disk Space: 20 MB of free space required.
  • Processor: Intel Pentium 4 or higher.

Air Explorer Pro Free Download

Air Explorer Pro 2.8.1


Air Explorer Pro 4.0.1


How to install Air Explorer Pro

  • Turn off anti-virus software (Note also turn off Windows Defender)
  • Extract the downloaded file
  • Run the Setup file to install the software
  • Uncheck the 2 marks in the last step (Advertising that)


  • Finished watching Windows 10 – 64bit video test


Reality is still the reality that everyone has passion. Passion is one thing living with it is another. Passionate without making money, it will be crushed by time.



Software Description:

The Multi-Timer Ultimate application wasdesigned to meet the requirements of the most demanding users, in aprivate, professional and even scientific environment.

At the same time it is very easy and intuitively to operate and youwill probably not need this help file at all.

Here are some key features of “Multi-TimerUltimate”:
– Virtually unlimited timers in a clear and neat flow layoutinterface (add 1, 5 or 10 timers at once)
– Drag and Drop support – timers can be moved within the array bydrag & drop
– Each timer can be set up to count up, count down or work in alarmclock mode
– Timers can be paused and resumed later, even after programshutdown
– Optional Auto-Resume on program start – launches every timerwhich has been interrupted
– Scientific-use accuracy! Multi-Timer Ultimate features a displayaccuracy of 1 second or (optional) 1/10 second, but a calculationaccuracy of better than 1/100,000 (10-6) seconds internally (evenon interrupted use). Time spans are calculated from the start timeand the current time, which guarantees the highest accuracy
– Counts up to (or down from) up to 1000 hours (over 41 days)
– Alarms can go off at a specified date, daily, on working days(Monday – Friday) or on a specified day of the week
– Background color (for each timer separately) and display (LEDstyle) colous can be changed (several presets are included);changeable wallpaper / background image / color for the windowbackground
– Hidden (system tray) mode
– Each timer has a short, changeable title and a text field forunlimited notes
– Timers can be started, stopped and reset single, complete or ingroups
– Start time, stop time, total elapsed time and percentage ofelapsed time is displayed in an integrated, sortable list(table)
– The list can be used to control the timers with the context menu,single or in groups
– Print the list (table) or export it to an Excel spreadsheet
– 12 hour / 24 hour (military time) display support and countryspecific date formatting
– Optional sound signal on alarm – plays any sound file in wav, mp3or wma format
– Extremely efficient programming, to guarantee the highestpossible accuracy under all operating circumstances and thesmallest processor load, even when many timers are operated
– Easy to use and to configure: You probably won’t need the helpfiles at all – all the bells and whistles if you like, but stillintuitive and simple! It’s not only a tool – it’s also a toy!
– Ready for Windows Vista
– Excellent program stablilty and accuracy.
– Check out the fully functional Trial Version for 15 days – and ifyou like it, buy a key! One license is valid for every computer you(only you) are using. Free updates for a lifetime.

Installer Size: 3.5 MB

Download Links : Air Explorer Pro v2.2.0 + Crack

Copy the download link and paste to your browser

Air explorer pro Registration Code


  1. В @Nigel AdamsВ  if germs are in fact the cause of infectious disease then why did they fail to prove that here

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *